You’re innocent until proven guilty, that has little to do with being given benefits of the doubt.
You forgot a very important part: you’re innocent until proven guilty BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. THAT definitely has something to do with being given the benefit of the doubt.
It just means he’s innocent in the eyes of the law until convicted, it doesn’t mean we can’t speak harshly based on what looks like clear evidence.
You’re 100% free to speak. But one of things we’ve been arguing about whether he should have been found guilty of second degree murder. When we are talking about whether the cop should be convicted in a court of law, we must by definition, give him the benefit of the doubt.