EDIT: I know most of them won’t do that, but that’s the mindset amongst many people. “Oh, he was unarmed, but it looked like he could’ve been reaching for a gun. Better safe than sorry.”
You make a good point, but consider this: what if the cop in question were a family member of yours? You might then prefer the “better safe than sorry” approach.
I probably would, but I would also prefer that my cop family member opt for a taser or stun-gun in a situation where he’s got an apparently unarmed suspect held at gunpoint.
Post #1139906
- Author
- Warbler
- Parent topic
- Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
- Link to post in topic
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1139906/action/topic#1139906
- Date created
- 9-Dec-2017, 12:34 AM