Again, here’s my original quote.
I am not surprised one bit at this. We were watching the Macy’s parade last week and my wife said she was shocked nothing had come out about him yet.
Show me where I said she said anything close to “he looks like someone who would sexually assault women.”
That’s not at all what she said. It has nothing to do with his looks. That’s what you read, not what I said.
I think if you reread his comment, you will see that you are the one who is reading into comments. Ray asked “Based on what?” He asked possible clarification questions, but nothing conclusive. Then he said that, unless there’s a good reason, it’s an ugly thing to say. I don’t care if it were your wife or anyone else, but if someone said something like that about me (because I guarantee you, there would be no evidence, considering there has never been such an event), it sure would be an ugly thing to say.
I am not surprised one bit at this. We were watching the Macy’s parade last week and my wife said she was shocked nothing had come out about him yet.
Based on what? How he looks? The way he talks?
Until someone has a real reason to say something like that it’s a terribly ugly thing to say, even if they end up being right.
JEDIT: If your wife had additional valid reasons, then that’s fine. But he was just asking what those reasons were. I do feel you have overreacted and that he truly didn’t mean to cause offense.