I mean, if he was talking about a depiction of Christ coming down off of a crucifix, that still doesn’t make sense, because that suggests the actual Man didn’t actually exist.
I’m not sure sure what you’re referring to by this.
A crucifix is a depiction of a Roman cross with Christ nailed to and hanging from it. I’m saying the real Jesus of Nazareth, be He Christ or not, is not on the cross anymore, and the depictions of Christ on a crucifix are not real.
I’m saying that it makes zero sense no matter how you slice it.
I know what a crucifix is. I was commenting on your statement that implied he was an indisputable historical figure.
It is generally accepted that he actually did exist, and apparently there is historical non-religious evidence to support it, regardless of the credibility of the events surrounding and involving him.