Okay, so part of the problem is Frink is very opinionated, and he often will often poke the bear. (As evidence of the latter, I submit the Burj-Khalifa bunny.)

Also part of the problem is that Warbler is very opinionated and has a hard time accepting his opinion as opinion instead of as truth. (As evidence of the latter, I submit the ST’09-killed-Trek-Prime argument in the Star Trek thread.)

Regarding the former in both cases, there is a middle ground between either of your positions on controversial issues, and you both have difficulty acknowledging the merit of the opposing view. Although it may appear to me for different reasons—Warbler does not acknowledge opposing view when he simply perceives it as wrong, not just different; Frink does not acknowledge opposing view when he simply doesn’t want to and it’s more funny for him to poke holes in it.