Quote
Originally posted by: MeBeJedi
To my knowledge, the version without the timecode was created from the version with a timecode - i.e. they used a filter to de-logo the numbers and re-encoded it, so while less distracting, you now have an XVID that's been encoded twice.
And don't expect this thread to last much longer. Jay doesn't need the legal hassle.
Incorrect, while the original WP could be the source for the non-timecode version (xvid), it certainly isn't ripped from the timecoded print.