A former(?) forum-member proudly claimed in this very thread that he shed a tear of joy at his little daughter’s gun use and collection of weapons. Some of us were horrified no doubt but I think it’d be fair to say ALL of us would be horrified if he’d proudly declared that his young kid was already a full-blown alcoholic after he’d started her on Absinthe at an early age (we’d probably hope he was arrested). Why is a relatively (I want to emphasise that word) harmless thing like alcohol treated as worse in the eyes of the law than weapons designed specifically for the mass slaughter of human beings?
I think the forum member you refer to is Ferris. He is still a forum member here(he hasn’t been banned or anything), he has hasn’t posted for a while. Yes, his daughter is allowed to use guns. But to be fair, I think he made clear that she was only allowed to use guns while he was there(or perhaps the mother or other responsible adult) using reasonable gun safety, which I think he takes seriously. I think he made clear the girl was not allowed unsupervised access to guns.