What exactly are the problems with the prelogy?
- Bad leadership of actors, and in fact bad actors…
OK, but can not we say the same thing about the original trilogy where,
No.
honestly, Mark Hamill is as convincing as a ficus, and Carrie Fisher owes her aura only to the returns that Harrison Ford gave her?
Mark’s performance in all three films is great and better in each film. Carrie is a wonderful presence and, like Mark, her acting and delivery created a character the public has loved for decades. Nobody remembers anybody (or anything) from the PT for those same reasons.
- Unbearable character (Jar Jar), only intended to please children …
OK, but frankly, are the Ewoks more acceptable? I remember, in 1983, being very disappointed by the Ewoks, I thought it was a heresy from George to close such an important work with teddies. I was a lot more shocked by the Ewoks than by Jar Jar 16 years later.
Ewoks are silly, sure. But everything in the PT is just as silly and executed just as poorly, if not worse.
- Poor scenario, script errors, weak dialogues …
OK, but can not we say the same thing about the original trilogy
NO. Hard no. If you don’t like the OT, why are you even here? The scripts are good, the story is great and the characters are wonderful. ALWTF.
- Inconsistencies and illogisms with the canon …
OK, but the original trilogy is also incoherent with itself
That just isn’t true.