nudity is nudity.
you’re point? What do you think would happen if guy standing next to the statue exposed his penis?
You really don’t know how to make comparisons. If you can’t understand the difference between a woman breastfeeding and the woman next to her that takes off her shirt just to scare you, no one here can help you.
That was not the point of what I said there. I was trying show that just because we allow nude statues in an art museum, doesn’t mean we allow nude real humans.
Of all the things in this world to get bent about, … breastfeeding? Does it really have any impact whatsoever on anyone but the mother and baby? And is there anything more essential to a growing baby? Such a non-issue.
Seems like another example of contradictory “right to life” stuff. All for the baby when it’s in the womb, but once it’s born, more interested in a woman’s modesty than in the baby’s most basic health needs.
Not to mention that in a large number of other western countries, people aren’t as hung up over exposed breasts. Spend some time in Italy and France for another perspective.