Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 385

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

And breastfeeding in public is lawfully allowed. Try to get it changed if you want.

Ironically, not on nude ‘sexy time party’ beaches.

It isn’t? Didn’t know that.

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

nudity is nudity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_(Michelangelo)

you’re point? What do you think would happen if guy standing next to the statue exposed his penis?

You really don’t know how to make comparisons. If you can’t understand the difference between a woman breastfeeding and the woman next to her that takes off her shirt just to scare you, no one here can help you.

That was not the point of what I said there. I was trying show that just because we allow nude statues in an art museum, doesn’t mean we allow nude real humans.

TV’s Frink said:

dahmage said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Jeebus said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because men and women are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, womens’ breasts are covered and mens’ aren’t.

The beaches where women are allowed to be topless are called NUDE beaches. Think about that.

Just because “that’s the way it’s always been” doesn’t mean it’s correct. I’m actually inclined to say that it’s the opposite.

You are entitled to that opinion. But this isn’t about what should be, but what is. Try to get it changed if you want. But for now, exposure of female breast is considered nudity.

And breastfeeding in public is lawfully allowed. Try to get it changed if you want.

Ironically, not on nude ‘sexy time party’ beaches.

What about the never-nude beaches? Why are those allowed? Should grown men really be allowed to wear cutoffs in a G-rated movie? What kind of monstrous society are we living in?

*sigh*

TV’s Frink said:

yhwx said:

At what point does a breast become indecent?

I think whenever Warb thinks of one on a woman.

I will allow the law to decide that.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

Men and women are physically different. You know this.

Right now the breasts on a female are considered a private part and their exposure is considered nudity. If you wish to change this, feel free to try.

DuracellEnergizer said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

And sometimes it’s the man who has the larger pair. Case in point:

*sigh*

TV’s Frink said:

Why are chickens allowed to expose their breasts in restaurants? There are children in those restaurants…

*sigh*

Warbler said:

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Warbler said:

*sigh*

What is so difficult to understand?

breast on female = private part

display of private part = nudity

nudity not appropriate in public area, unless area is zoned for nudity.

Breasts shouldn’t even be considered “private parts”. Men can go around topless, so why can’t women? 'Cause extra fatty deposits?

Because white people and black people are different. That is the way it has been done for years. Go the average public pool, white people are allowed and black people aren’t.

You could have just have easily said this. None of it makes it right.

that is asinine. men and women are physically different. You know this.

They both have breasts and nipple. Sometimes the breasts can be bigger in one sex. So what?

Men and women are physically different. You know this.

Right now the breasts on a female are considered a private part and their exposure is considered nudity. If you wish to change this, feel free to try.

Warb, there is an effort to do that very thing.

Bare breasts being nudity is very much up for debate.

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

person X posts pic of a topless man, person y posts a pic of topless woman. Do you think Jay and mods would react to both X and Y the same?

Warbler said:

person X posts pic of a topless man, person y posts a pic of topless woman. Do you think Jay and mods would react to both X and Y the same?

Does x =y? I was never very good a algebra

Just kidding, I was amazing.

yhwx said:

Warbler said:

person X posts pic of a topless man, person y posts a pic of topless woman. Do you think Jay and mods would react to both X and Y the same?

Whether they react the same or not is not the point here.

Oh, I think it is very much the point.

SilverWook said:

If Julie Andrews is willing to expose them, yes? 😉

?

Warbler said:

SilverWook said:

If Julie Andrews is willing to expose them, yes? 😉

?

Her breasts I think. Or maybe nipples. Or maybe she would expose a man’s breast or nipple.

Warbler said:

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

I don’t think MPAA ratings should exist at all in their current form, so…

dahmage said:

Warbler said:

SilverWook said:

If Julie Andrews is willing to expose them, yes? 😉

?

Her breasts I think. Or maybe nipples. Or maybe she would expose a man’s breast or nipple.

You make no sense.

DominicCobb said:

Warbler said:

Ok, so it is.

Btw, what would you think of bare breasts in a G rated movie?

I don’t think MPAA ratings should exist at all in their current form, so…

Well they do exist.