- Time
- Post link
Yeah but what if we don’t count posts that are just agreeing with other posts?
The yhwx 5,000 Post Countdown Thread! — Page 10
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
97% of the way there.
At my current posting rate, the (estimated) big day would be August 5, 2017.
Yeah but what if we don’t count posts that are just agreeing with other posts?
All posts are equal under the eyes of the countdown threads.
- Time
- Post link
Yeah but what if we don’t count posts that are just agreeing with other posts?
I agree
- Time
- Post link
170 posts to go!
Neglify!
- Time
- Post link
Guys, I don’t post here to hit a number.
- Time
- Post link
Guys, I don’t post here to hit a number.
This post would seem to indicate otherwise.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
You’re wrong and you refuse to accept why.
- Time
- Post link
But you keep posting about it.
- Time
- Post link
That doesn’t mean anything. Your argument is just utterly stupid and wrong. I don’t say you only post just to reach 70,000 or 100,000 posts, do I?
- Time
- Post link
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that graphic is wrong.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
It’s not a graphic, it’s a historical marker that applies to both you and Princess Leia.
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that historical marker is wrong.
Again, your argument is stupid, idiotic, and foolish.
- Time
- Post link
I agree.
Although I believe you don’t post to hit a number. I believe you post because you have some form of ocd where you have to respond to everything whether you actually have a response or not.
- Time
- Post link
I agree.
Although I believe you don’t post to hit a number. I believe you post because you have some form of ocd where you have to respond to everything whether you actually have a response or not.
I just wanted to let everyone know that yhwx hasn’t posted in the last 30 seconds.
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that historical marker is wrong.
Again, your argument is stupid, idiotic, and foolish.
I WIN
- Time
- Post link
I agree.
Although I believe you don’t post to hit a number. I believe you post because you have some form of ocd where you have to respond to everything whether you actually have a response or not.
Your assuming that I have some sort of mental condition is insulting to me. I ask you politely to discontinue this behavior.
Also, your claim is untrue.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
I’m positive it wasn’t intended as an insult, and you kind of proved his point with your third sentence.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
You can’t make a medical diagnosis over the Internet. OCD is a serious psychological and mental condition. Wanting your bookshelf to be neatly organized isn’t it. People overuse and misuse the term too much.
- Time
- Post link
Also, why can’t I defend myself? Other people on the forum do it all the time, and they don’t get criticized nearly as much as I do. It’s me against the rest of the forum.
- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
Would it make you feel better if he were to say “your posting habits exhibit OCD tendencies”?
I mean, mine kind of do as well. It’s not that big of a deal.
- Time
- Post link
Also, why can’t I defend myself? Other people on the forum do it all the time, and they don’t get criticized nearly as much as I do. It’s me against the rest of the forum.
You are taking this way too seriously.
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that historical marker is wrong.
Again, your argument is stupid, idiotic, and foolish.
WRONG
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that historical marker is wrong.
Again, your argument is stupid, idiotic, and foolish.
WRONG
YOU’RE THE PUPPET
- Time
- Post link
You’re still wrong and that historical marker is wrong.
Again, your argument is stupid, idiotic, and foolish.
WRONG
YOU’RE THE PUPPET
(SNIFF) WRONG