Looks great. Neverar can retire early.
As with much of your software, Dre, when I look at this I think “oh, this has commercial potential, why is he wasting his skills on us?”. Which got me thinking, what are the potential legal ramifications of machine learning algorithms like this? If Neverargreat was a commercial entity, and you built an algorithm that used examples of his to learn from, but didn’t actually include any of his work in the software, does he still have any stake in what that ‘bot’ produces? Presumably not, in cases where an AI is trained from the work of numerous artists. But if you really are training a bot to be a Neverar that doesn’t need food/water/sleep, how does that work out?