Ok, let’s try the same question asked differently…
Do you have a problem with this reporting the way you do with all other reports about the administration? If not, what’s the difference this time?
I have a problem with any reporting being touted as verifiable 100% fact. If, he was doing pay for play and it can be legally verified, him and Hillary should go to jail. If, they can legally verify that he had conversations he should not have, he deserved to be fired. Hillary Clinton did lie during her testimony about the emails and she is free as a bird. It set a sad precedent for all Government officials going forward. I thought Comey was a good man but even he couldn’t be reliable when it came to what he did, how he did it, and testimony he gave in front of Congress. Trump was right about one thing … he is the first President to ever be treated with such hostility by the media because they didn’t want him in office. I try very hard to piece together what I can from all the stories out there and it is not as easy to do when you just want the unadulterated truth.
Since you believe nothing I say and/or say that everything I say is unintelligible it would not matter whether I had a problem. The only time you believe or understand anything I say (like the post in question) is if it shows support for what you’ve said.