I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.
False equivalency.
Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.
This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.
Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?
Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.
Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.
Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.
But when I said “false equivalency” you said “not so”…argh, whatever.
I’m amazed that people continue to respond to Jetrell’s posts. Every time someone does, a new rabbit hole opens up, and it’s frustration all the way down.
To be clear, I don’t think that Jetrell is a bad guy - in fact he seems like a totally nice person. Just staggeringly illogical.
I’m not trying to be mean to you or start anything with this.
There is no logic in saying something is a false equivalency when no equivalency was claimed when it was posted wouldn’t you agree.