I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.
False equivalency.
Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.
This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.
Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?
Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.
Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.
Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.
Oh for goodness sake.
You posting an article about a somewhat (on the surface) similar historical case (that the Trump team has also been spinning all over the place today), during a discussion of the current case and sarcastically saying “I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this” isn’t you suggesting they are equivalent? Really. Then what was it for?
Please explain exactly what you meant by posting it, who “some of you” are, why you think those persons won’t remember it and exactly what you meant by your comment in general.
(EDIT: Frink’s comment above was posted at the same time as mine, not before. So please don’t take this as another example of the mob persecuting you. We just happened to both think your comments were baffling)