I’m guessing some of you don’t remember this.
False equivalency.
Not so. A President is within his legal power to do it no matter which President it is.
This has nothing to do with my point, and everything to do with why it’s pointless to engage you on any topic.
Well then, explain, why do you believe it is a false equivalent?
Because Comey is not under investigation for using public funds for private use.
Because Sessions was not investigating Clinton’s possible collusion with another nation to > undermine the election.
Fair enough but I didn’t say anything about it being equivalent.
But when I said “false equivalency” you said “not so”…argh, whatever.
I said once before that I don’t want to have a normal civil conversation with you because I don’t understand 90% of the things you say and it’s not worth the effort to try and decode everything. I stand by that.