https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/08/us/politics/obama-flynn-trump.html
“If President Obama was truly concerned about General Flynn, why didn’t they suspend his security clearance, which they approved just months earlier?” Mr. Spicer said during his daily press briefing.
“Not only did they reaffirm it, but they took no steps to suspend it,” Mr. Spicer said. He said that decision casts doubt on how vigorous Mr. Obama’s warning to Mr. Trump was during their meeting in November.
Evidence please.
It’s in the fracking article I quoted from
Not is isn’t. You quoted two sentences by Sean Spicer that are not backed up by any evidence in his words, your words, in the article, or anywhere I can find.
…read it would you, it’s not something I am stating myself, yeesh.
Better yet, if you’re too lazy to read, watch then …
^ Do you not think language like that sounds a bit dickish considering you didn’t understand my post, or Sean Spicer’s words, or the article you posted. Me saying “two plus two, equals five” doesn’t become true because somebody quotes an article of me saying it. If you can find some evidence to support the two sentences you picked out then great, that’s all I asked for.
On a side note, when Spicer says “security clearance” he means the maximum possible level of clearance as Trump has tweeted. Not the minimum level of clearance that evidence seems to show.
York Times wrote the fricking article, ask them, NOT me.
But you pulled out those two quotes from it. The only two quotes that don’t seem to have any supporting evidence. Which is why I was asking for it.
Don’t you think it’s a bit dickish to keep hounding on someone that said they quoted it from the article, linked to the article the quote was in, and then had to explain that if you needed more you should ask the New York Times, the folks that wrote the article?
I’m not sure how much clearer I need to be. I would guess there are other articles on the same matter elsewhere, google them instead of harassing me because you think Sean Spicer is a fool.