Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 238

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pm

I’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.

Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!

Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.

She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.

Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.

The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].

There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.

Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.

I’ll keep everyone updated!

Mike Cernovich

Cernovich Media

I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.

If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.

As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.

Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.

So you made the statement about me?

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

So why post it then?

It was an article I hadn’t read and I know the Clinton’s have been associated with Epstein. Is that a problem?

An old irrelevant article from a whack-job alt-right conspiracy theorist. Ok.

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

So why post it then?

It was an article I hadn’t read and I know the Clinton’s have been associated with Epstein. Is that a problem?

An old irrelevant article from a whack-job alt-right conspiracy theorist. Ok.

Your opinion is one thing, your rhetorical nonsense however is nonsense.

JEDIT: I should have used question dodging but I’m human too.

.

You know what, never mind. I should know better than to waste my time like this. Post whatever pointless nonsense you want.

TV’s Frink said:

You know what, never mind. I should know better than to waste my time like this. Post whatever pointless nonsense you want.

If you were willing to engage in normal discussion about it, cool, but since you never want to you should just keep ignoring me. I think it’s best for everyone including me.

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pm

I’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.

Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!

Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.

She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.

Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.

The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].

There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.

Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.

I’ll keep everyone updated!

Mike Cernovich

Cernovich Media

I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.

If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.

As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.

Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.

So you made the statement about me?

I see we have failure to communicate. I will attempt to translate.

Conflating hebephilia with pedophilia is inaccurate and misleading. That’s not to say adults having sex with teenagers is ethical, but it’s not the same as molesting prepubescent children. Therefore everyone (emphasis on EVERYONE) should make the effort to learn the difference between hebephiles and pedophiles and distinguish them accordingly.

tl;dr: I hate histrionic headlines. I’m not accusing you of being a pedophile or whatever the fuck you thought.

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

You know what, never mind. I should know better than to waste my time like this. Post whatever pointless nonsense you want.

If you were willing to engage in normal discussion about it, cool, but since you never want to you should just keep ignoring me. I think it’s best for everyone including me.

I agree. If you could do likewise that would also be nice. Unfortunately you’ve never even tried, instead responding to just about every single post I make here.

And it’s not that I don’t want to engage in conversation, it’s that I literally can’t because I never understand anything you say.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pm

I’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.

Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!

Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.

She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.

Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.

The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].

There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.

Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.

I’ll keep everyone updated!

Mike Cernovich

Cernovich Media

I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.

If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.

As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.

Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.

So you made the statement about me?

I see we have failure to communicate. I will attempt to translate.

Conflating hebephilia with pedophilia is inaccurate and misleading. That’s not to say adults having sex with teenagers is ethical, but it’s not the same as molesting prepubescent children. Therefore everyone (emphasis on EVERYONE) should make the effort to learn the difference between hebephiles from pedophiles and distinguish them accordingly.

tl;dr: I hate histrionic headlines. I’m not accusing you of being a pedophile or whatever the fuck you thought.

No need to be a dick or condescending. I know what both of those terms mean. I didn’t write the article. I also know I don’t like seeing myself being referenced in some way in the same sentence as the word pedophile. I’d guess you don’t either. All I wanted was your assurance that it was not the case. You’ve now done that in a crappy and crappier way so it’s done.

I asked you twice to clarify. It is not my fault that you waited to be a jerk about it to do so.

This is why the DNC shouldn’t have pushed Hillary to run in the first place. Didn’t they know the Clintons are the most hated and scandal-plagued family to conservative Republicans? That running an out-of-touch establishment candidate against a fascist demagogue at the wrong time is a recipe for disaster? Now Obama is a footnote in history, 24 million people are going to lose their health insurance, and the Supreme Court is going to halt any progress well into the 2060s. Their stupidity has ruined this nation forever.

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

You know what, never mind. I should know better than to waste my time like this. Post whatever pointless nonsense you want.

If you were willing to engage in normal discussion about it, cool, but since you never want to you should just keep ignoring me. I think it’s best for everyone including me.

I agree. If you could do likewise that would also be nice. Unfortunately you’ve never even tried, instead responding to just about every single post I make here.

And it’s not that I don’t want to engage in conversation, it’s that I literally can’t because I never understand anything you say.

It’s pretty hard to converse with someone that talks shit about every person that doesn’t see things their way. I have tried having a decent conversation with you but you always go in to the same old routine of making fun of me, talking shit about me, making crappy remarks in other threads about me, and then telling me you don’t understand a word I say. I speak fucking English too ya know. On top of all this, you always have to have the last word. I mean you couldn’t even ignore me now … you had to have something to say.

Why is it so hard for you to be normal in conversation? Why does everything you have to say have to be made to sound like you’re the smarter person? I get it, you know stuff, I know stuff too.

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pm

I’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.

Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!

Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.

She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.

Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.

The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].

There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.

Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.

I’ll keep everyone updated!

Mike Cernovich

Cernovich Media

I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.

If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.

As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.

Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.

So you made the statement about me?

I see we have failure to communicate. I will attempt to translate.

Conflating hebephilia with pedophilia is inaccurate and misleading. That’s not to say adults having sex with teenagers is ethical, but it’s not the same as molesting prepubescent children. Therefore everyone (emphasis on EVERYONE) should make the effort to learn the difference between hebephiles from pedophiles and distinguish them accordingly.

tl;dr: I hate histrionic headlines. I’m not accusing you of being a pedophile or whatever the fuck you thought.

No need to be a dick or condescending. I know what both of those terms mean. I didn’t write the article. I also know I don’t like seeing myself being referenced in some way in the same sentence as the word pedophile. I’d guess you don’t either. All I wanted was your assurance that it was not the case. You’ve now done that in a crappy and crappier way so it’s done.

I asked you twice to clarify. It is not my fault that you waited to be a jerk about it to do so.

I’m sorry for the condescension, but too many times in the past I’ve had the message/intent of a post misconstrued because I failed to paint a clear picture right off the bat of what I was trying to say, leading to arguments which only got angrier and more personal as they went on. I wanted to avoid that this time around.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

DuracellEnergizer said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pm

I’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.

Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.

Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!

Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.

She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.

Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.

The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].

There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.

Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.

I’ll keep everyone updated!

Mike Cernovich

Cernovich Media

I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.

If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.

As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.

Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.

So you made the statement about me?

I see we have failure to communicate. I will attempt to translate.

Conflating hebephilia with pedophilia is inaccurate and misleading. That’s not to say adults having sex with teenagers is ethical, but it’s not the same as molesting prepubescent children. Therefore everyone (emphasis on EVERYONE) should make the effort to learn the difference between hebephiles from pedophiles and distinguish them accordingly.

tl;dr: I hate histrionic headlines. I’m not accusing you of being a pedophile or whatever the fuck you thought.

No need to be a dick or condescending. I know what both of those terms mean. I didn’t write the article. I also know I don’t like seeing myself being referenced in some way in the same sentence as the word pedophile. I’d guess you don’t either. All I wanted was your assurance that it was not the case. You’ve now done that in a crappy and crappier way so it’s done.

I asked you twice to clarify. It is not my fault that you waited to be a jerk about it to do so.

I’m sorry for the condescension, but too many times in the past I’ve had the message/intent of a post misconstrued because I failed to paint a clear picture right off the bat of what I was trying to say, leading to arguments which only got angrier and more personal as they went on. I wanted to avoid that this time around.

I appreciate your candor and your discourse on the matter. I would really like to have more conversations that are well rounded as this one turned out.

Thank you.

CatBus said:

So basically he’s a prominent white nationalist-lite conspiracy theorist with a pedophile fixation.

Husezni’s true identity revealed.

He can’t even get puns right.

CatBus said:

Seems typical legit.

You couldn’t find your own shtick?

😉

SilverWook said:

Either that’s fake or he deleted it. I’m guessing the former because I can’t find any stories about it.

I think the impending deaths of 24 million people is more important right now than a stupid twitter post.

24 million people were probably going to lose insurance under the previous failed bill, per the CBO. It’s unknown how many people would potentially lose insurance under this plan, and the Senate is sure to make fairly severe amendments to it as well. And of course, losing insurance does not equal death for a large number of people. For some, yes, and that will be blood on the Republican’s hands (and all because they can’t stop themselves from creating more giveaways to the rich while fucking over the poor)…but your exaggerations do not help your points at all.

TV’s Frink said:

24 million people were probably going to lose insurance under the previous failed bill, per the CBO. It’s unknown how many people would potentially lose insurance under this plan, and the Senate is sure to make fairly severe amendments to it as well. And of course, losing insurance does not equal death for a large number of people. For some, yes, and that will be blood on the Republican’s hands (and all because they can’t stop themselves from creating more giveaways to the rich while fucking over the poor)…but your exaggerations do not help your points at all.

Do you know who we are up against? We have a president that only does not respect the law or any morals whatsoever, but openly flaunts and brags about it.

generalfrevious said:

TV’s Frink said:

24 million people were probably going to lose insurance under the previous failed bill, per the CBO. It’s unknown how many people would potentially lose insurance under this plan, and the Senate is sure to make fairly severe amendments to it as well. And of course, losing insurance does not equal death for a large number of people. For some, yes, and that will be blood on the Republican’s hands (and all because they can’t stop themselves from creating more giveaways to the rich while fucking over the poor)…but your exaggerations do not help your points at all.

Do you know who we are up against? We have a president that only does not respect the law or any morals whatsoever, but openly flaunts and brags about it.

Are you suggesting we’re up against this child actor?

😉

CatBus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

CatBus said:

Seems typical legit.

You couldn’t find your own shtick?

😉

If you don’t like unoriginal schtick, don’t post unoriginal conspiracy theories.

There’s a Jeffrey Epstein conspiracy theory? You may want to tell that to him so he can feel free to leave his island paradise and come back to the world. There are people wanting to hear his side of the story.

😉