Billionaire Pedophile’s Accused Madame Lawsuit Update!
Jan 31 at 10:25pmI’d bet the Clinton’s may be hiding out while this heats up. Their dear friend Mr. Jeffrey Epstien, might be getting his playtoys spanked.
Mike Cernovich of reader-supported Cernovich Media filed a motion to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell, a case involving a sex trafficking victim and an accused sex trafficker. Since filing a motion to intervene, two important updates have occurred.
Ghislaine Maxwell has been sued again!
Disgraced Wall Street mogul Jeffrey Epstein is being accused by a woman of luring her into his elaborate sex trafficking enterprise under the ruse he would use his wealth and connections to get her into college.
She has slapped him a federal lawsuit in US District Court in New York demanding damages for forcing her to perform sex acts on him, according to documents filed Thursday and obtained by DailyMail.com.
Using the alias ‘Jane Doe 43,’ the woman filed a federal lawsuit against Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Natalya Malyshev.
The victim’s lawyers filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion for summary judgment. Each document filed therewith merely contains the caption and the word [REDACTED].
There is no way to tell what is going on in the case, as it has been filed under seal. This is a total cover-up and disagrace, as the public has a right to know what has happened.
Any party wishing to oppose our motion to intervene/unseal will need to do so on or before this coming Thursday, Feb. 2nd.
I’ll keep everyone updated!
Mike Cernovich
Cernovich Media
I see people still don’t know understand what a pedophile is.
If you are referring to me with this statement I will say right now that your comment is NOT the least bit funny and I would ask that a mod remove it and you. I hope that is not the case.
As for the legal case, do you have inside information with regards to Mr. Epstein that could exonerate him because if you do I’m sure plenty would like to see it. It is legal fact that he is a registered sex offender.
Yeah, I looked up who Epstein is. He’s accused of soliciting sex from underage girls as young as 14. That’s hebephilia, not pedophilia. Pedophiles like their kids much younger than that.
So you made the statement about me?
I see we have failure to communicate. I will attempt to translate.
Conflating hebephilia with pedophilia is inaccurate and misleading. That’s not to say adults having sex with teenagers is ethical, but it’s not the same as molesting prepubescent children. Therefore everyone (emphasis on EVERYONE) should make the effort to learn the difference between hebephiles from pedophiles and distinguish them accordingly.
tl;dr: I hate histrionic headlines. I’m not accusing you of being a pedophile or whatever the fuck you thought.
No need to be a dick or condescending. I know what both of those terms mean. I didn’t write the article. I also know I don’t like seeing myself being referenced in some way in the same sentence as the word pedophile. I’d guess you don’t either. All I wanted was your assurance that it was not the case. You’ve now done that in a crappy and crappier way so it’s done.
I asked you twice to clarify. It is not my fault that you waited to be a jerk about it to do so.