I laugh at people buying 4K TVs… your eyes are almost certainly not good enough to tell the difference in the vast majority of viewing scenarios. Total waste of money
If we were just talking about the absolute resolution, you are right. At my normal viewing distance I can’t tell the difference between 720 and 1080. I’m certainly not going to see much improvement from a 4k screen. But it isn’t just the resolution. The more pixels you have to display the image data, the better the image looks. The pixels start to disappear and be truly invisible. I’ve known this about printing for years, but when you apply it to video, it really helps the realism of the image, even if you are watching a 480 DVD. With the proper hardware, everything will look better on a 4k screen, even if you never get a UHD player or media.
My dad has a 43 inch 4K TV and DVDs look horrendous.
Often, if you turn off all that image enhacent crap, lower quality sources like dvd actually look better. I have a 51" 1080p plasma tv, and i think DVD’s look pretty damn good if they were authored at high bitrate. a bit soft, but good.
I have a 40 inch 1080p and DVDs look great unless I’m directly comparing them to Blu Rays. I honestly believe that 4k as a resolution is simply too high for a TV. As far as projecting goes, I’m sure it’s great, but when you’re watching 480i-1080p content from a 40-60 inch TV and sitting about 10-12 feet away, it seems unnecessary.
It definitely makes a difference for projectors. Several years ago My uncle upgraded from a 1080p Domino projector to a 4k Sony SXRD that could also do 3D. The Domino looked perfectly fine, but with the Sony I noticed the pixels were no longer visible more than a few inches from the screen.
The pixel problem is something I’ve also noticed with TVs. It must have something to do with the display tech (ips/tn/va lcd vs plasma vs oled, etc), because I’ve seen 1080p sets in the same size range with noticeably different pixel visibility. 4k eliminates this problem for the most part.
Another funny thing to consider is the screen size / seating distance / screen resolution debate. I’ve also got a 40" 1080p but I sit less than five feet from it. The tv is a sony lcd from almost nine years ago. Right around that time, I remember there was the opinion that 1080p is wasted below 50". In other words, it was hard to see the difference over 720p unless the screen was at least that big. That may have been true at more normal seating distances, but I like to sit close enough to the screen to recreate the movie theater experience and the jump in resolution is definitely noticeable.
I seem to recall that a couple years ago the debate had turned into “4k is wasted below 80”."