logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 222

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

They move Carlson to 8pm. The first person they have him interview is Bruce Jenner.

Gotta admit, that’s a very clever way to discredit the one “conservative” who was gaining traction.

I wonder if the same INTENSELY DEPRAVED SATANISTS who give us NatGeo homo-tranny kiddie-porn and delusional non-miraculous little boy-raper “Jesus” will keep trotting out their vomit-inducing Baphomet horrors until Carlson and Hannity are the most despised A-holes in the little that’s left of this nation.

Why did you quote your own post?

He was channeling his inner Frink.

😉

Which part of “No Fo vs. Frink” is the part you don’t understand?

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

They move Carlson to 8pm. The first person they have him interview is Bruce Jenner.

Gotta admit, that’s a very clever way to discredit the one “conservative” who was gaining traction.

I wonder if the same INTENSELY DEPRAVED SATANISTS who give us NatGeo homo-tranny kiddie-porn and delusional non-miraculous little boy-raper “Jesus” will keep trotting out their vomit-inducing Baphomet horrors until Carlson and Hannity are the most despised A-holes in the little that’s left of this nation.

Why did you quote your own post?

He was channeling his inner Frink.

😉

Which part of “No Fo vs. Frink” is the part you don’t understand?

Which part of “get off your high horse your highness” do you not understand?

You have quoted your own posts on this forum, one of the few that do, and I referenced it. It wasn’t a .vs comment, it wasn’t an attack, and it wasn’t a verbiage disguised insult that you are well known for.

Shove off and leave me alone. This is the second time I’ve asked you. You don’t have the right to harass people without consequences just because you believe others you’ve suggested have done the same to you should be punished. You have a problem with me referencing something humorously that you’ve done openly and frequently, talk to a mod.

Spoiled brat …

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

They move Carlson to 8pm. The first person they have him interview is Bruce Jenner.

Gotta admit, that’s a very clever way to discredit the one “conservative” who was gaining traction.

I wonder if the same INTENSELY DEPRAVED SATANISTS who give us NatGeo homo-tranny kiddie-porn and delusional non-miraculous little boy-raper “Jesus” will keep trotting out their vomit-inducing Baphomet horrors until Carlson and Hannity are the most despised A-holes in the little that’s left of this nation.

Why did you quote your own post?

He was channeling his inner Frink.

😉

Which part of “No Fo vs. Frink” is the part you don’t understand?

Shove off and leave me alone. This is the second time I’ve asked you. You don’t have the right to harass people without consequences just because you believe others you’ve suggested have done the same to you should be punished. You have a problem with me referencing something humorously that you’ve done openly and frequently, talk to a mod.

Seems to me that you’re purposely poking the bear, trying to goad him into a response, and when he gives in you say it’s harassment because you’ve asked him to stop. Being left alone is a two-way street, don’t mention him, he won’t mention you, and everyone will be happier for it.

Author
Time

Word to the posse … I am asking you to leave me alone as well. We don’t need a rake Fo over the rails train in here, all it does is escalate issues unnecessarily.

Thank you.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Jeebus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

They move Carlson to 8pm. The first person they have him interview is Bruce Jenner.

Gotta admit, that’s a very clever way to discredit the one “conservative” who was gaining traction.

I wonder if the same INTENSELY DEPRAVED SATANISTS who give us NatGeo homo-tranny kiddie-porn and delusional non-miraculous little boy-raper “Jesus” will keep trotting out their vomit-inducing Baphomet horrors until Carlson and Hannity are the most despised A-holes in the little that’s left of this nation.

Why did you quote your own post?

He was channeling his inner Frink.

😉

Which part of “No Fo vs. Frink” is the part you don’t understand?

Shove off and leave me alone. This is the second time I’ve asked you. You don’t have the right to harass people without consequences just because you believe others you’ve suggested have done the same to you should be punished. You have a problem with me referencing something humorously that you’ve done openly and frequently, talk to a mod.

Seems to me that you’re purposely poking the bear, trying to goad him into a response, and when he gives in you say it’s harassment because you’ve asked him to stop. Being left alone is a two-way street, don’t mention him, he won’t mention you, and everyone will be happier for it.

So he can mention me but I cannot mention him? I see.

When he mentioned me last and I complained I got rule 6 tossed at me (by a few of you) and NONE of you told him to not mention me but now you can come here and blatantly defend him making me the bad guy again? No thanks.

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Who-is-Ignoring-You-and-Who-are-You-Ignoring-was-Who-is-Ignoring-You-was-Hello-all-Im-back/id/10866/page/73

Check out this page and get back to me on how much sense your post just made.

😦

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I’m booking you two a room at the Clown Motel if you don’t start ignoring each other.

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Jeebus said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

They move Carlson to 8pm. The first person they have him interview is Bruce Jenner.

Gotta admit, that’s a very clever way to discredit the one “conservative” who was gaining traction.

I wonder if the same INTENSELY DEPRAVED SATANISTS who give us NatGeo homo-tranny kiddie-porn and delusional non-miraculous little boy-raper “Jesus” will keep trotting out their vomit-inducing Baphomet horrors until Carlson and Hannity are the most despised A-holes in the little that’s left of this nation.

Why did you quote your own post?

He was channeling his inner Frink.

😉

Which part of “No Fo vs. Frink” is the part you don’t understand?

Shove off and leave me alone. This is the second time I’ve asked you. You don’t have the right to harass people without consequences just because you believe others you’ve suggested have done the same to you should be punished. You have a problem with me referencing something humorously that you’ve done openly and frequently, talk to a mod.

Seems to me that you’re purposely poking the bear, trying to goad him into a response, and when he gives in you say it’s harassment because you’ve asked him to stop. Being left alone is a two-way street, don’t mention him, he won’t mention you, and everyone will be happier for it.

So he can mention me but I cannot mention him? I see.

Not what I said. If you don’t mention him, he won’t feel the need to respond.

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Word to the posse … I am asking you to leave me alone as well.

Gladly.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

SilverWook said:

I’m booking you two a room at the Clown Motel if you don’t start ignoring each other.

If you’re offering separate rooms and room service, I’m in.

There should be NO issue when posts are a simple reference, nothing more, of any member. It’s when one simple reference that is complained about and followed by a rule 6 note to the one complaining while a rule 6 note is not made to the other member who does the same thing when the issue starts to boil. I also don’t have a posse to kick in the doors and start throwing stuff at Frink, LOL.

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Who-is-Ignoring-You-and-Who-are-You-Ignoring-was-Who-is-Ignoring-You-was-Hello-all-Im-back/id/10866/page/73

It’s a simple matter really, put a stop to the posse strategy, and use rule 6 unilaterally.

If that happens, I’ll pay for a separate room but I still want room service on you. I’d even wear a clown suit for the free room service. How could you pass on a deal like this?

😃

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

I’m booking you two a room at the Clown Motel if you don’t start ignoring each other.

I have been.

Author
Time

I wish the references to “the posse” would stop.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

thejediknighthusezni said:

After seeing the Satanist/atheist version of The Ministry/Crucifixion ON RESSURECTION SUNDAY, I hope the Vatican keeps O’Reilly until they all go off to Hell.

What the heck are you rambling on about??

I’m not sure there is such a thing as the “Satanist/Atheist version of the Crucifixion”. I mean, what?!? …Unless you’re talking about the film “The Last Temptation of Christ”. Yes, that film is all kinds of straight up wrong.But then, if you object to it, why would you watch it? And on Easter Sunday?

Even so, what does Easter have anything to do with Bill O’Reilly and why should “the Vatican keep [him]”?!?

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

^^They have answered to it, we’ve kinda-sorta joked about it even, so I’m not sure how it affects you.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Jetrell Fo said:

^^They have answered to it, we’ve kinda-sorta joked about it even,

I missed that there were further pages. It was the last post on that page, and it was the page I linked to.

so I’m not sure how it affects you.

Stop being a jerk, Jetrell.

I think people wouldn’t “rake you over the coals” if you weren’t an avid apologist for Trump. If all you were doing was “giving him a chance”, you wouldn’t complain about “liberals”, use Fox News as a supposed legitimate news source, and complain about peoples’ unhappiness with Trump without acknowledging why they might be.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

After seeing the Satanist/atheist version of The Ministry/Crucifixion ON RESSURECTION SUNDAY, I hope the Vatican keeps O’Reilly until they all go off to Hell.

What the heck are you rambling on about??

I’m not sure there is such a thing as the “Satanist/Atheist version of the Crucifixion”. I mean, what?!? …Unless you’re talking about the film “The Last Temptation of Christ”. Yes, that film is all kinds of straight up wrong.But then, if you object to it, why would you watch it? And on Easter Sunday?

Even so, what does Easter have anything to do with Bill O’Reilly and why should “the Vatican keep [him]”?!?

Maybe it has something to do with one of Bill’s books?

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

After seeing the Satanist/atheist version of The Ministry/Crucifixion ON RESSURECTION SUNDAY, I hope the Vatican keeps O’Reilly until they all go off to Hell.

What the heck are you rambling on about??

Just like I’m 93% sure he’s collected a child pornography collection (on purpose), you can make this response to 93% of his posts.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

chyron8472 said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

After seeing the Satanist/atheist version of The Ministry/Crucifixion ON RESSURECTION SUNDAY, I hope the Vatican keeps O’Reilly until they all go off to Hell.

What the heck are you rambling on about??

I’m not sure there is such a thing as the “Satanist/Atheist version of the Crucifixion”. I mean, what?!? …Unless you’re talking about the film “The Last Temptation of Christ”. Yes, that film is all kinds of straight up wrong.But then, if you object to it, why would you watch it? And on Easter Sunday?

Even so, what does Easter have anything to do with Bill O’Reilly and why should “the Vatican keep [him]”?!?

Maybe it has something to do with one of Bill’s books?

I think last year National Geographic did a movie of that book. But I don’t recall it being Satanic or Atheist.

Author
Time

Any version of Christianity that isn’t husezni’s = Satanist/atheist

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

chyron8472 said:

thejediknighthusezni said:

After seeing the Satanist/atheist version of The Ministry/Crucifixion ON RESSURECTION SUNDAY, I hope the Vatican keeps O’Reilly until they all go off to Hell.

What the heck are you rambling on about??

Just like I’m 93% sure he’s collected a child pornography collection (on purpose), you can make this response to 93% of his posts.

No one will ever believe you’re under 18, Frink.

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

Word to the posse … I am asking you to leave me alone as well. We don’t need a rake Fo over the rails train in here, all it does is escalate issues unnecessarily.

Thank you.

Traitorous critic fallacy (ergo decedo) – a subtype of ad hominem where a critic’s perceived affiliation is seen as the underlying reason for the criticism and the critic is asked to stay away from the issue altogether.

Just because multiple people express similar reactions to your posts does not mean they are working in collusion. Perhaps you should consider how your own conduct may lead to the very situations you claim you wish to avoid.

“It’s a lot of fun… it’s a lot of fun to watch Star Wars.” – Bill Moyers

Author
Time
 (Edited)

corellian77 said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Word to the posse … I am asking you to leave me alone as well. We don’t need a rake Fo over the rails train in here, all it does is escalate issues unnecessarily.

Thank you.

Traitorous critic fallacy (ergo decedo) – a subtype of ad hominem where a critic’s perceived affiliation is seen as the underlying reason for the criticism and the critic is asked to stay away from the issue altogether.

Just because multiple people express similar reactions to your posts does not mean they are working in collusion. Perhaps you should consider how your own conduct may lead to the very situations you claim you wish to avoid.

https://plus.google.com/112014638873996167438/posts/CQu1eQCswUa

I don’t know where you fit in to this but looking up Latin (which is easy with google) doesn’t make one a scholar of the subject matter. The posts I speak of have come as regularly as the tick of a clock. That is not coincidence in my book nor is it me being mistaken.

I appreciate your input, no matter how it’s intended, stay away works both ways as does your silly Latin attempt to justify the point of your post and the rules in this forum governing the specific issue.

As you can see in my avatar, I’m wearing the clown suit as promised, I’m now going to order my free room service courtesy of Silverwook.

Can we get back on topic now?