I went through every page and read every post. I would just like to say real quick about the Michael Jackson thing, and this is not towards the person who originally used MJ as an example. Watching the news, the family sueing MJ supposedly went to Jay Leno and asked him for money, Jay Leno is going to testify against that family. I don't really follow the case so I don't want to say anything else to dig myself into a hole. But is there really any proof that MJ is a child molestor? That's all I have to say on that.

Now back to the original post. I turned 19, so I saw Episode I when I was 13 and Episode II when I was 15. When I first saw them I didn't know about all this "controversy". But as I watch them now, I thought I liked the PT better, but I am realizing that the OT is what made SW what it is. Watching the PT, it definitely seems that Lucas didn't think about what he was doing and just put the movies together quickly. One thing that sticks out in my mind is that in the OT it was said that Obi-Wan was Yoda's apprentice but in episode I he was Qui-Gon Jinn's apprentice? Yeah, he wasn't thinking there. In other posts you can find out more contradictions. I am hoping that ROTS is better than the first two PT movies. But I definitely prefer the OT.