Quote
I find myself thinking that George is only a few steps away from falling off the same 'emotional ly troubled billionaire' pier that Michael Jackson fell off of.
Anyone care to defend this statement without sounding like a total schizoid?
Because comparing his saying "My two trilogies seem to appeal to two different fanbases" to someone who's ON TRIAL FOR MOLESTING CHILDREN seems pretty goddamned far-fetched to me. As a matter of fact, it doesn't even seem to be a comparison. And you're saying it with a straight face.
You also compare him to Howard Hughes. Once again, let's make the direct comparison
"The two trilogies seem to have two completely different audiences." -- George Lucas
"I never leave my bed and have my blood completely replaced with virgin mormon blood every other week, and I hate niggers." -- Howard Hughes.
Yet JOE is the psychotic one. Okay. You're so knee-deep in your overreaction that you can't even OFFER a defense of your wallowing in character assassination. The best you can do is "You're a troll." and "Stop reading it if you don't like it."
It's like you guys KNOW you've gone flying off the deep end, you just don't care.
Is there anything particularly WRONG with his GENERAL characterization of the two fanbases these trilogies seem to have? Because from where I'm sitting--I don't see it. Yes, it's a generality, which means there will be exceptions, and sometimes a fair amount of them, but jesus--I don't think his analogy is that far-fetched. Certainly not to the point where he's seriously compared to a child-molester and a racist modern-day vampire.
And yet JOE is the one with issues that need psychoanalyzing.
I could make this entire thread swallow their own tongues in about 5 minutes with the moronic self-serving histrionics you guys spew daily, but I'm nice and I save my efforts for when you guys go REALLY over the top and need to be spanked for it.