I hate the way that the Planned Parenthood official claimed that you can’t “target women” and get away with it even though one of the people charged is a woman.
What does that matter? If a woman bombs an abortion clinic, she isn’t targeting women? Only men can target women?
That’s a false equivalence. I’m talking about the way pro-abortion advocates frame the issue as you being either for abortion (and for women), or against abortion (and against women). I doubt that the woman arrested for the undercover filming of Planned Parenthood thinks she’s against women. She would say that she is in favor of the unborn babies aborted at Planned Parenthood, which would be approximately 50% female. That’s how she, and other antiabortion activists see the issue. At most, you can say that they’re against women that get abortions.
I also don’t think that their investigation was a legitimate violation of privacy.
Maybe, maybe not, but it was certainly against the law.
https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press_releases/Complaint Affidavit_SF.PDF?
I know it was, but it doesn’t look like it was an invasion of privacy or something that actually harmed anybody so it shouldn’t be framed that way.