logo Sign In

Post #1058600

Author
Jetrell Fo
Parent topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1058600/action/topic#1058600
Date created
24-Mar-2017, 12:10 AM

SilverWook said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/politics/adam-schiff-trump-russia-grand-jury/

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee is claiming that he has been presented with new information on collusion between associates of President Donald Trump and Russia that would merit a grand jury investigation.

Rep. Adam Schiff told CNN Thursday that he had seen additional evidence, but would not specify what it was.

“We continue to get new information that, I think, paints a more complete picture of at least what we know at the outset of our investigation,” Schiff said.

Asked to explain his comments earlier in the week when he said there was more than just “circumstantial evidence of collusion,” Schiff said, "I do think that it’s appropriate to say that it’s the kind of evidence that you would submit to a grand jury at the beginning of an investigation.

“It’s not the kind of evidence that you take to a trial jury when you’re trying to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt. But we’re at the beginning of an investigation, and given the gravity of the subject matter, I think that the evidence certainly warrants us doing a thorough investigation.”

SilverWook said:

Trumpy is starting to lose some fans.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/21/health/opioid-trump-supporter-medicaid-health-care-reform/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2017/03/23/moss-former-trump-supporter-tapper-lead-intv.cnn

And I think Trumpy owes Chevy Chase a check for stealing his catch phrase.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/23/politics/trump-time-interview-wiretaps-falsehoods/index.html

CNN is probably not the best source for unbiased and accurate reporting, IMO anyways.

If someone says they no longer support Trump, how can CNN distort it?

That I get.

The articles I’ve taken issue with from them are subjective as hell considering their verbiage but get posted here and kinda represented as “this actually happened”, “this is the full truth”, “no way anyone can dispute this CNN article” thing and it’s just not true. At this point there is NO full truth about what happened, that is why it’s being investigated. Add to that, you have anonymous Federal Intelligence sources talking to CNN about classified material, any average person should question stories based on such claims.