logo Sign In

Post #105272

Author
THX
Parent topic
Letterboxed Widescreen vs. Anamorphic Widescreen Discussion
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/105272/action/topic#105272
Date created
12-May-2005, 12:04 PM
Having read all the above, I am much more informed than I was about DVD technology - thank you. However, I am still slightly confused about DVD regions vs. video standards and I'm sure you guys know all about this, so...

1) Are region 1 DVDs in NTSC resolution and region 2 in PAL resolution (in which case why the new names)?
2) If so, do multi-region players therefore scale between these standards in real-time?

From what I previously knew and what I have learned here, it seems as if:

a) the best possible LD>DVD transfer should start with a PAL LD, regardless of the eventual region/standard of viewing;
b) from there, an anamorphic DVD would be best for all 16:9 TV owners, a letterboxed DVD for most 4:3 owners;

Please correct me if I am wrong. Another question that then arises is:

3) Which is better for NTSC viewers, PAL disc played on multi-region player with player's real-time scaling or NTSC disc made from PAL transfer?

If the answer is, as I suspect, the latter, would this mean that any transfer would ideally exist in 4 versions (PAL AM, PAL LB, NTSC AM, NTSC LB)?

Once again, thank you all for sharing your technical know-how.