I also reject NPV as subversive of the constitution verging on fraud.
Actually, it doesn’t. The Constitution allows each state to decide for itself how it will award it’s own electoral votes. This includes awarding them to the winner of the state popular vote, a vote by the state legislature, awarding them by popular vote in each Congressional district within the state(and two votes to winner of the state popular vote), or awarding the electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote. States rights.
I realize that it’s the right of the state, but firstly, the NPV agreement isn’t based on the state’s popular vote, it’s based on the nationwide popular vote. Secondly, does it not mess with the system to have some states on this system and others not? Shouldn’t they just try to change the constitution instead of subverting it?
What if a super red state like Texas signs the NPV agreement and is then forced to give its electoral votes to the Democratic candidate just because they won the nationwide popular vote? How does that make sense?