logo Sign In

Post #1044838

Author
TV's Frink
Parent topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1044838/action/topic#1044838
Date created
8-Feb-2017, 4:25 PM

TV’s Frink said:

doubleofive said:

Jetrell Fo said:

doubleofive said:

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Libel is a legal matter that could cost any business millions of dollars, not just Mrs. Trump. Get a clue.

Libel is bad, yes, but she’s not a business. She’s a potential business because of her position as the First Lady. And isn’t badmouthing a corporation a form of libel? Sure, Nordstrom’s stock went up, but they can probably sue for the tweet.

The stock actually went down immediately after the tweet, then recovered.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/nordstrom-recovers-from-trumps-terrible-tweet-in-just-4-minutes-2017-02-08

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Wednesday that Trump had every right to tweet at Nordstrom, as the tweet wasn’t about promoting a family business but defending his daughter against an attack.

Here’s the brutal attack:

Early last Friday, Nordstrom said it would stop selling the Ivanka Trump brand but said the move was purely a business decision and not one based on protests or any other political reason. The company told MarketWatch that it culls about 10% of the brands it carries every year. Based on the Ivanka brand’s performance, it said, “we’ve decided not to buy it for this season.”