logo Sign In

Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo — Page 98

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Warbler said:

Well, I see free speech is alive an well on the US Senate floor. Not.

http://patch.com/us/across-america/elizabeth-warren-censured-after-comments-jeff-sessions

https://teespring.com/ShirtsOfTheResistance?aid=marketplace&tsmac=marketplace&tsmic=search#pid=2&cid=2397&sid=front

I am sure the African American kids siting at the whites only lunch counter were also warned and then given an explanation. Yet they persisted.

Author
Time

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Heh, I didn’t even notice that! There are too many conflicts of interest to keep track of.

Author
Time

What are you talking about Frink? This is just more fear mongering from those that hate Trump, and lies from CNN.

Author
Time

dahmage said:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/army-grant-easement-dakota-access-pipeline/story?id=45330548

trump doesn’t think the pipeline is controversial. Can any reasonable person justify that line of “thinking”?

Exactly what I was talking about before. I just can’t even wrap my head around it anymore.

My theory is that Frink was right and Trump never actually wanted to be President, and now that he’s faced with the gravity and responsibility of the position, he’s becoming more reclusive and lashing out more. As it becomes more and more clear he has no idea what he’s doing and no plan and doesn’t realize he can’t just make everything happen magically.

Frankly, he sounds depressed.

Keep Circulating the Tapes.

END OF LINE

(It hasn’t happened yet)

Author
Time

I like that he’s upset they haven’t confirmed his whole cabinet yet so that he can either ignore their advice or just let them run things while he tries to promote his brand.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

Jetrell, you decry the lack of proper debate here. Some time ago I tried having a discussion with you, and since then I’ve decided not to try again. Debate was impossible, as the most basic laws of logic (modus ponens, etc.) seemed absent. By contrast most others here, even those with whom I disagree much more strongly, such as Ferris, do share a basis in verbal reasoning. If people don’t always respond to you, it may be out of frustration. My apologies for being so blunt.

Your words seem to imply that it hurts my feelings if people do not respond and that is simply untrue. All I see in this thread is the bashing of the President, no debate at all.

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Libel is a legal matter that could cost any business millions of dollars, not just Mrs. Trump. Get a clue.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Jetrell Fo said:

Puggo - Jar Jar’s Yoda said:

Jetrell, you decry the lack of proper debate here. Some time ago I tried having a discussion with you, and since then I’ve decided not to try again. Debate was impossible, as the most basic laws of logic (modus ponens, etc.) seemed absent. By contrast most others here, even those with whom I disagree much more strongly, such as Ferris, do share a basis in verbal reasoning. If people don’t always respond to you, it may be out of frustration. My apologies for being so blunt.

Your words seem to imply that it hurts my feelings if people do not respond and that is simply untrue. All I see in this thread is the bashing of the President, no debate at all.

Dude, no offense, but what do you expect? There are about 15 different people that post repeatedly in this topic and about 13 of them fall far to the left on the political spectrum and about 2 fall far to the right (you being one of the two on the right.) There’s nothing wrong with that, personally I couldn’t care less what end of the political spectrum someone falls within, but the phrase “Pissing into the wind” comes to mind. Getting worked up about anything said here (or any other forum on the internet) is silly.

I like to check the thread every few days for giggles (I couldn’t participate that much on a regular basis even if I wanted to, I wouldn’t be able to get any work done), but there’s no grand mystery here.

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time
 (Edited)

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Example, I nailed Frink on the CNN picture he posted “allegedly”" showing Trump’s daughter and her Fiance at a White House meeting. He never spoke of it afterwards, I didn’t say anything further, but he didn’t acknowledge he was wrong.

I am doing my very best to ignore you as much as I possibly can in every single situation (not just in this thread). However, this was one of the few times I actually responded to you because I was not wrong, despite your accusations. They (she and her husband, not fiance) were at the meeting, it wasn’t a dinner, and the follow-up link you posted was from a dinner the previous evening and was unrelated to the point being made. And you posted a link yourself that showed where they both sat during the meeting.

If you want to believe you are right and the proof is that people are ignoring you, that’s your business. I look forward to ignoring whatever response you cook up to make yourself feel better.

I really don’t care how upstanding you think it makes you by ignoring me. You’re a regurgitater of anything you find that supports your personal views, when it comes to this stuff anyways, nothing more. If you weren’t so fuckin hostile towards anything I say than maybe we could actually have some real discourse but because you refuse to it will never change.

JEDIT:

I went back to the discussion Frink and you are right, they were there, but not in any illegal capacity that I could find. I apologize.

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Example, I nailed Frink on the CNN picture he posted “allegedly”" showing Trump’s daughter and her Fiance at a White House meeting. He never spoke of it afterwards, I didn’t say anything further, but he didn’t acknowledge he was wrong.

I am doing my very best to ignore you as much as I possibly can in every single situation (not just in this thread). However, this was one of the few times I actually responded to you because I was not wrong, despite your accusations. They (she and her husband, not fiance) were at the meeting, it wasn’t a dinner, and the follow-up link you posted was from a dinner the previous evening and was unrelated to the point being made. And you posted a link yourself that showed where they both sat during the meeting.

If you want to believe you are right and the proof is that people are ignoring you, that’s your business. I look forward to ignoring whatever response you cook up to make yourself feel better.

I really don’t care how upstanding you think it makes you by ignoring me. You’re a regurgitater of anything you find that supports your personal views, when it comes to this stuff anyways, nothing more.

^insult

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

no debate at all.

debate is frustrating, impossible and a waste of time with you.

Author
Time

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Example, I nailed Frink on the CNN picture he posted “allegedly”" showing Trump’s daughter and her Fiance at a White House meeting. He never spoke of it afterwards, I didn’t say anything further, but he didn’t acknowledge he was wrong.

I am doing my very best to ignore you as much as I possibly can in every single situation (not just in this thread). However, this was one of the few times I actually responded to you because I was not wrong, despite your accusations. They (she and her husband, not fiance) were at the meeting, it wasn’t a dinner, and the follow-up link you posted was from a dinner the previous evening and was unrelated to the point being made. And you posted a link yourself that showed where they both sat during the meeting.

If you want to believe you are right and the proof is that people are ignoring you, that’s your business. I look forward to ignoring whatever response you cook up to make yourself feel better.

I really don’t care how upstanding you think it makes you by ignoring me. You’re a regurgitater of anything you find that supports your personal views, when it comes to this stuff anyways, nothing more.

^insult

^Pot calling the kettle black?

Author
Time

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Example, I nailed Frink on the CNN picture he posted “allegedly”" showing Trump’s daughter and her Fiance at a White House meeting. He never spoke of it afterwards, I didn’t say anything further, but he didn’t acknowledge he was wrong.

I am doing my very best to ignore you as much as I possibly can in every single situation (not just in this thread). However, this was one of the few times I actually responded to you because I was not wrong, despite your accusations. They (she and her husband, not fiance) were at the meeting, it wasn’t a dinner, and the follow-up link you posted was from a dinner the previous evening and was unrelated to the point being made. And you posted a link yourself that showed where they both sat during the meeting.

If you want to believe you are right and the proof is that people are ignoring you, that’s your business. I look forward to ignoring whatever response you cook up to make yourself feel better.

I really don’t care how upstanding you think it makes you by ignoring me. You’re a regurgitater of anything you find that supports your personal views, when it comes to this stuff anyways, nothing more.

^insult

Is it?

Author
Time

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

no debate at all.

debate is frustrating, impossible and a waste of time with you.

You’ve never even tried debating with me so I am unsure why you would even say that.

Author
Time

Tyrphanax said:

dahmage said:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/army-grant-easement-dakota-access-pipeline/story?id=45330548

trump doesn’t think the pipeline is controversial. Can any reasonable person justify that line of “thinking”?

Exactly what I was talking about before. I just can’t even wrap my head around it anymore.

My theory is that Frink was right and Trump never actually wanted to be President, and now that he’s faced with the gravity and responsibility of the position, he’s becoming more reclusive and lashing out more. As it becomes more and more clear he has no idea what he’s doing and no plan and doesn’t realize he can’t just make everything happen magically.

Frankly, he sounds depressed.

Maybe he has dementia?

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

doubleofive said:

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Libel is a legal matter that could cost any business millions of dollars, not just Mrs. Trump. Get a clue.

Libel is bad, yes, but she’s not a business. She’s a potential business because of her position as the First Lady. And isn’t badmouthing a corporation a form of libel? Sure, Nordstrom’s stock went up, but they can probably sue for the tweet.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Well we do have some armchair/keyboard physicians in here, maybe we can ask them, I’m sure they’d be right with whatever they say it is.

😉

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

Jetrell Fo said:

doubleofive said:

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Libel is a legal matter that could cost any business millions of dollars, not just Mrs. Trump. Get a clue.

Libel is bad, yes, but she’s not a business. She’s a potential business because of her position as the First Lady. And isn’t badmouthing a corporation a form of libel? Sure, Nordstrom’s stock went up, but they can probably sue for the tweet.

Libel is libel, no matter what, learn your law. It also reads like he was taking a pot shot at himself, not Nordstrom, so I doubt it.

Author
Time

Libel isn’t libel if you re-arrange the word slightly and add a couple letters. Then it’s Snible.

Harrison Ford Has Pretty Much Given Up on His Son. Here's Why

Author
Time

Are we supposed to be using this thread for debate? It’s hard to do that when most of us just post links to quotes from people or pictures of people and the only opposition is “that’s not true”.

Has Trump defeated debate?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

Stinky-Dinkins said:

Libel isn’t libel if you re-arrange the word slightly and add a couple letters. Then it’s Snible.

LOL, with this, I agree.

😃

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Are we supposed to be using this thread for debate? It’s hard to do that when most of us just post links to quotes from people or pictures of people and the only opposition is “that’s not true”.

Has Trump defeated debate?

Ask Frink, he seems to be the most knowledgeable on this subject.

😉

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Jetrell Fo said:

doubleofive said:

I’ll admit I was wrong, it was his daughter that had the clothes line, but it was his wife who won a lawsuit because she can’t bank on her brand as well as she’d like.

Libel is a legal matter that could cost any business millions of dollars, not just Mrs. Trump. Get a clue.

Libel is bad, yes, but she’s not a business. She’s a potential business because of her position as the First Lady. And isn’t badmouthing a corporation a form of libel? Sure, Nordstrom’s stock went up, but they can probably sue for the tweet.

The stock actually went down immediately after the tweet, then recovered.