Jetrell Fo said:

TV’s Frink said:

https://www.thenation.com/article/leaked-draft-of-trumps-religious-freedom-order-reveals-sweeping-plans-to-legalize-discrimination/

Lovely.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/01/21/heres-how-pro-lifers-responded-to-being-excluded-from-the-womens-march-on-washington/

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jan/17/pro-life-women-banned-anti-trump-womens-march-wash/

https://www.aol.com/article/news/2017/01/25/anti-abortion-group-of-banned-womens-march-protesters-showed-up/21662068/

Don’t be so qiuck to judge, the Women’s March was in fact a Feminist March and if you were Pro-Life you were banned from attendance by the group. Most Feminists are women but not all women are feminists so I’m sure there was a reason why it wasn’t named the “Feminist Only March” on Washington.

I don’t think the fact that the Women’s March was a feminist march is any secret. That was kind of the point and implicit in the organization. I don’t know how you could expect anything else. Not all women consider themselves feminists, but if you showed up to the march to support women’s rights, you’re either a feminist or a dumb shit for not realizing you should be feminist.

Protecting women’s right to choose was clearly one of the goals of the protesters, though not the only one. I don’t think if you were pro-life your were barred from protesting, but it wouldn’t really make any sense to protest abortion at the march. Not the time or place. I’m not surprised others would be upset with pro-lifers promoting pro-life at the march.