Warbler said:

Bingowings said:

Warbler said:

Bingowings said:

Warbler said:

Bingowings said:

SilverWook said:

MalàStrana said:

I know it’s going to be historic. The man is funny AND seems to be efficient. Obama had good speeches but without intelligent actions speeches are worthless, and so are Obama’s 8 years: worthless. He only brought more wars than Bush and let ISIS spread. So yeah, thanks Obama, really… won’t miss you…

Do you complain about your own country’s leaders this much?

I do.
The guy is right.
He was elected as some kind of modern messiah figure and carried on bombing the middle east and torturing people. He is was as effective as a leader as Bush (as in he was a figure head with very little real influence).
David Cameron however had real power. He assumed he would win Brexit and silence the eurosceptics in his party for a generation and lost the UK probably trillions. Bush and Obama are fake news.
Cameron is a really evil dick and Theresa May is the g-spot of evil.

How do you come to the conclusion that W. Bush and Obama were just figure heads with real influence while David Cameron had real power??? Also if W. Bush and Obama were just figureheads, just you do you think was really in charge? Congress?

https://youtu.be/OyBNmecVtdU

I guess from that, that you think the military industrial complex is really in charge. But I still do not understand why you think David Cameron was not a figurehead.

On it’s own the UK is a largely uninfluential tiddly little collection of countries so nobody bothered to disarm the post of Prime Minister. However in screwing up and accidentally triggering Brexit Cameron has started a chain reaction that could have enormous international consequences. Current US presidents are too well managed to do anything near as significant without the permission of the powers that really be. May is getting a trip to the vet by the look of things though.

A trip to the vet? can you translate that to American?

http://spayneuternewjersey.com/

*sigh*

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Anyone believing that Hillary Clinton’s appearance at the Inauguration was due to her being a class act is deceiving themselves. She was there because she had to be, not because she wanted to be. It benefits her, not America.

She didn’t have to be there.

It was a political move, not one out of the kindness of her heart, so yeah she had to be there. You give her too little credit when it comes to playing the politics game.

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Anyone believing that Hillary Clinton’s appearance at the Inauguration was due to her being a class act is deceiving themselves. She was there because she had to be, not because she wanted to be. It benefits her, not America.

She didn’t have to be there.

It was a political move, not one out of the kindness of her heart, so yeah she had to be there. You give her too little credit when it comes to playing the politics game.

She did not need to be there. There was no legal requirement for her to be there.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Anyone believing that Hillary Clinton’s appearance at the Inauguration was due to her being a class act is deceiving themselves. She was there because she had to be, not because she wanted to be. It benefits her, not America.

She didn’t have to be there.

It was a political move, not one out of the kindness of her heart, so yeah she had to be there. You give her too little credit when it comes to playing the politics game.

She did not need to be there. There was no legal requirement for her to be there.

Furthermore, she’s done in politics, so there was no political need to be there either.

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Thanks for the suggestion but I am politely passing on your offer. My Gamera avatar works just fine.

😃

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Thanks for the suggestion but I am politely passing on your offer. My Gamera avatar works just fine.

😃

Maybe I’ll see if Ferris wants it.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not. I never said there was a legal requirement. One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Thanks for the suggestion but I am politely passing on your offer. My Gamera avatar works just fine.

😃

Maybe I’ll see if Ferris wants it.

I’d bet he’ll politely decline as well but since I am not him, I cannot and am not speaking for him. Legally or otherwise.

😉

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not.

oh I am so sorry.

I never said there was a legal requirement.

You said she had to be there, that is simply not true.

One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

why would need/want to curry political favors from Trump? Why would she expect that to work?

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Thanks for the suggestion but I am politely passing on your offer. My Gamera avatar works just fine.

😃

Maybe I’ll see if Ferris wants it.

I’d bet he’ll politely decline as well but since I am not him, I cannot and am not speaking for him. Legally or otherwise.

😉

whatever.

Thankful to have been flying today so I had an excuse to skip the national embarrassment celebration. Random guy in the airport put it best: “I’m glad I’ll be off planet earth when that asshole is sworn in.” Having been on a flight that went from one side of the country to the other, I can say with some certainty that at no point was the sun shining through to the ground. A whole nation overcast. Seems appropriate.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not.

oh I am so sorry.

I never said there was a legal requirement.

You said she had to be there, that is simply not true.

One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

why would need/want to curry political favors from Trump? Why would she expect that to work?

I also never said it had anything to do with Trump. That was your assumption as well. Politics is a corrupt business across the board. I, personally, don’t believe she is done with politics no matter what she says. Retirement never equalled done, finished, ended, or otherwise. It’s a polite way to bow out of the spotlight.

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

The world is full of assholes, they are certainly not exclusive to Mr. Trump.

Hey Jetrell, here is a new avatar for you to use during the Trump Administration:

Thanks for the suggestion but I am politely passing on your offer. My Gamera avatar works just fine.

😃

Maybe I’ll see if Ferris wants it.

I’d bet he’ll politely decline as well but since I am not him, I cannot and am not speaking for him. Legally or otherwise.

😉

whatever.

How many times need I ask you to stop this line of response with me? You can’t just be respected without showing a little back to others warb especially if you want them to take you at your word.

Tyrphanax said:

The Right Wing has 1,455 days of uncontested free reign over all branches of government (give or take, not counting midterms) to get the country “back on track” (I thought it was doing alright as it was?). There’s really no excuse they can make for any failing or any slips or any problems that arise

That may be, but you better believe they’ll have lots of excuses ready.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not.

oh I am so sorry.

I never said there was a legal requirement.

You said she had to be there, that is simply not true.

One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

why would need/want to curry political favors from Trump? Why would she expect that to work?

I also never said it had anything to do with Trump. That was your assumption as well.

and its the correct one, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HER DECISION TO ATTEND TRUMP’S INAUGURATION. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!!! Good grief.

http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/08/02/obamas-15-worst-excuses-for-his-failed-presidency-n1873896

http://www.forbes.com/sites/briandomitrovic/2016/08/20/obamas-economic-excuses-are-firing-up/#79a186b0ddfe

http://ijr.com/2017/01/777880-obama-has-excuse-for-why-no-he-didnt-two-foes-who-undermined-his-entire-presidency/

Excuses are like asses and elbows … we ALL have them.

😃

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not.

oh I am so sorry.

I never said there was a legal requirement.

You said she had to be there, that is simply not true.

One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

why would need/want to curry political favors from Trump? Why would she expect that to work?

I also never said it had anything to do with Trump. That was your assumption as well.

and its the correct one, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HER DECISION TO ATTEND TRUMP’S INAUGURATION. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!!! Good grief.

It is your opinion that it is the correct one based on how you feel about Trump. If you think she needs Trump to gain favor you should be LOL’ing at yourself for even making the comment.

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Warbler said:

Jetrell Fo said:

So, you guys know Hillary Clinton personally, and can absolutely vouch for her personal and private positions?

LMMFAO

We don’t have to know her personally to know that there is no legal requirement for her to attend Trump’s inauguration, and that she is done in politics.

You went the legal route, I did not.

oh I am so sorry.

I never said there was a legal requirement.

You said she had to be there, that is simply not true.

One does not need to be enaged in politics directly to search for political favors or connections.

why would need/want to curry political favors from Trump? Why would she expect that to work?

I also never said it had anything to do with Trump. That was your assumption as well.

and its the correct one, WE ARE TALKING ABOUT HER DECISION TO ATTEND TRUMP’S INAUGURATION. IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!!! Good grief.

It is your opinion that it is the correct one based on how you feel about Trump. If you think she needs Trump to gain favor you should be LOL’ing at yourself for even making the comment.

WE ARE TALKING ABOUT TRUMP’S INAUGURATION!! HOW IN THE HELL COULDN’T IT HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH TRUMP!?!?!

My God.