I suppose he’s hearkening to the “Earth has gone through several heating and cooling periods through the eons, so what we’re experiencing now is nothing new or unnatural” argument against AGW.
Well ok but if it’s unrecorded history he has no way of knowing that.
Exactly, and there’s way more of it than recorded history.
Ok, so it doesn’t worry you in the slightest that this was the hottest year in recorded history, or that the 16 warmest years since 1880 have all occurred in the 2000s except one (which was 1998), because there might have been one year before recorded history that was hotter. Maybe.
Ok.
Nope, it doesn’t bother me one bit. Furthermore, I absolutely doubt that we can either change or affect it whatsoever. Besides, a warmer earth even by a degree is better for us, it allows more crops to flourish among many other things.
I am pretty sure it would a bad thing for those effected increase in hurricanes and what not, also there are those that might find their properties under the ocean. I would think that to be a bad thing.
Plus, shall I again remind you “recorded history” is only the last 140 years? Unless you believe a young earth, then that’s pretty bad science to base an entire theory about the planet based only on .0000000001% of the earths history.
I think it based on more than that. I think scientists do have ways of examining the weather patterns before the recorded history. I think one is examining ice formations that are deep deep within the ice at the poles.
I do have to say if the fact that the 16 warmest years since 1880 have all occurred in the 2000s except one, doesn’t cause you the slightest bit of concern, you are not looking at this logically, rationally or in a non-biased manner.