logo Sign In

Post #1021708

Author
generalfrevious
Parent topic
The Force Awakens: Official Review Thread - ** SPOILERS **
Link to post in topic
https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/1021708/action/topic#1021708
Date created
20-Dec-2016, 2:39 PM

SilverWook said:

generalfrevious said:

DominicCobb said:

generalfrevious said:

DominicCobb said:

frevious please stop basing your opinions on other people’s.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ukk5TJL27pE

God I can’t watch that. “Epidemic”? That would imply it’s a bad thing that so many movies are passable. It’d be worse if they weren’t.

I wasn’t exactly wild about Rouge One. No internet reviewer gave me that opinion.

The Studios have more creative control than in any point in Hollywood’s history. Abrams was chosen because he was the ideal studio director: one that could be molded by the producers to churn out middle-of-the-road products designed to rake in enough money opening weekend. I don’t like the films made by committees as opposed to auteurs. Say what you want about George Lucas and the prequels; at least they had some kind of ambition, some sort of risk-taking of CGI boundaries, willing to bring in political themes unseen in previous films. They’re not good by any means, of course, but an ambitious failure is always more interesting than a solid yet forgettable blockbuster. Which film would you watch again, The Room or Captain America: Civil War?

I find it surprising that people on this thread are suddenly defending TFA when they have been bashing it only a few hours ago as “crap is crap.”

So, Tommy Wiseau should write, direct, and star in a SW movie?

No, what I’m really saying is that an infamously bad movie is often more memorable than an average one.