this is a good step in the right direction. Having a debate about evolution can sometimes be tricky. I will say that yes I am a Christian and believe the Bible is true. At the same time, there has to be physical evidence that supports creation in order for me to have an intelligent debate with other people about it. Now I don't clam to know everything, in fact that's why you hear the "it's in the Bible so it has to be true" line, because most of the christians who get into the debate don't know enough of the facts and how to use them. I would welcome alternative origins being taught in the classroom as theories and i would like evolution stressed as a theory and not as a fact, because lets face it we have no real way of being certain by physical means. The same could be said for creation. No one was there to witness it so how do we really confirm it scentifically? The truth is, that in order to take both at face value as fact and truth, one must believe and have faith in it. That's really the only way I can see that happening.

But really, what are the flaws of evolution as a theory? I'm all ears. Have you guys heard the news that some scientists are questioning whether the spead of light is even a constant? These are secular scientist and they have been studying this and researching it and they think that Einstien was wrong about the speed of light being a constant.