It's weird how the less George is involved in his own movies the better they seem to be. I think that generally speaking we could say that George is probably a better director for how gets more involved with the actors now. You all have a point though; if his movies aren't getting any better, does that really make him a better director? There is no good way to answer that.

I guess it was just one of those things that I noticed and started wondering about his directorial style has changed over the years...

I don't know. I guess it was a stupid question. Lock thread.