swagmasta69

Please explain why you think that.

The Motion Picture is an undeniably great film.

The Final Frontier has lots of issues but the Yosemite scenes are quintessential Trek, Sybok is great, and the search for God is interesting.
Lots of good Kirk/Spock/McCoy moments throughout as well.

Nemesis gets a baffling amount of hate.
Hardy knocks it out of the park, the romulans are always interesting, Spiner is great, THE RAMMING SCENE, the scorpion fyler in the hallways, the cool idea of picard having a clone… And on and on.

get to it

Holy god that’s strange. And hilarious.

you lost me ⁉️⁉️⁉️

Oh come on. The Motion Picture, The Final Frontier, and Nemesis are not bad movies.
It’s certainly not as outrageous of a claim as my love for ROTS.

TV’s Frink said:

http://originaltrilogy.com/topic/Your-Favorite-Punctuation-Mark/id/18240

§

Neglify said:

¿¿¿¿¿

¡¡¡¡¡

moviefreakedmind said:

I couldn’t make it through that article. What an embarrassment for the New Yorker to have to be forever associated with such nonsense. I can’t help but think it’s trolling because of the part describing the “unlimited power” line as something to cheer for. It reminds me of a critic on rotten tomatoes who gave every Star Trek film a negative review except for Star Trek V: the Final Frontier, saying, “Who knew it just needed William Shatner in the director’s seat to breathe new life to the franchise” or something like that, which just has to be a fraudulent joke.

For the record, the best Trek films are 1, 5, and 10.

The Simpsons color palette was so juicy.

Will do.

?
How is the usage of “no homo” to simply state that I didn’t intend something to be read certain way, a slur?
I’m not being negative towards homosexuals.

TV’s Frink said:

What the hell are you talking about?

I dunno.

TV’s Frink said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_homo#Criticism

Ah, “no u”. A true classic.

But really though, I’m just messing around, no hard feelings.

TV’s Frink said:

I’m not saying it isn’t Faustian.

And nice slur.

What slur, homo?

TV’s Frink said:

Mithrandir said:

-Anakin’s journey is Faustian.

Except for the part where it’s terribly done.

Is that relevant to what Gandalf said? Think long and hard now (no homo).

Sounds pretty reasonable honestly.
Inarritu has a very inflated ego.

Hm. Fair enough.

TV’s Frink said:

swagman is gonna be so embarrassed when he reads his posts again in five or ten years…

I felt embarrassed when you linked that post of me talking about JJ in the TFA thread, honestly.
I just post now and cringe later.

Smithers said:

swagmasta69 said:

Smithers said:
“Swagmasta” I speak directly to you now

Hello, Lord Voldemort.

I had that in mind when I typed that, glad you picked it up.

Are you being snarky or no?
Poe’s law, you know.

adywan said:

swagmasta69 said:

69 swagmasta69.

I most certainly do not want to do that 😉

That’s most regretable, friend.

Smithers said:
“Swagmasta” I speak directly to you now

Hello, Lord Voldemort.

TV’s Frink said:

Lol, and I’m guessing the bear should have been CGI.

Okay, i’m pretty tired, but are you making a joke or what? The bear was CGI, and so were most of the animals other than horses.

The Revenant is a beautiful film, but Lubezki is much more talented than Inarritu.
It’s a good movie, but Inarritu acts like his movies are as deep as a Malick film, just because he hired the same cinematographer.