- Post
- #301502
- Topic
- Info & Info Wanted: GOUT film grain
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301502/action/topic#301502
- Time
pants
- User Group
- Members
- Join date
- 30-Oct-2007
- Last activity
- 18-Nov-2007
- Posts
- 4
Post History
- Post
- #301497
- Topic
- Info & Info Wanted: GOUT film grain
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301497/action/topic#301497
- Time
Are they definitely 70mm scans, though? The reason I ask is that they appear to be full 2.35:1 without any cropping, but I though the Star Wars blow ups were 70mm full width – ie. 2.21:1
- Post
- #301493
- Topic
- Info Wanted: 1984 VHS Hi-Fi Sound – A better source for the ’77 stereo mix?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/301493/action/topic#301493
- Time
I was surprised by this claim in the first source:
'LD analog sound, at 75 dB s/n, is comparable to broadcast FM radio and superior to 35mm mag/optical film tracks and VHS Hi-Fi ...'
Is this correct? Is the signal to noise ratio the only factor in determining the quality of analogue sound? Does anyone know what the s/n for 35mm optical or magnetic is?
- Post
- #300225
- Topic
- Info Wanted: 1984 VHS Hi-Fi Sound – A better source for the ’77 stereo mix?
- Link
- https://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/300225/action/topic#300225
- Time
As far as I know the current audio recording of the original 1977 Dolby Stereo sound mix for Star Wars was preserved by Belbucus using the analogue track on a laserdisc. Would I be right in thinking that while the Hi-Fi sound on VHS tapes is inferior to Laserdisc digital PCM, it <span class=“Italics”>is</span> actually better quality than laserdisc’s analogue sound?
If so, would using the 1984 CBS/Fox VHS or Beta tapes provide a superior source for preserving the original theatrical audio mix?