logo Sign In

oojason

User Group
Members
Join date
5-May-2004
Last activity
17-Apr-2024
Posts
8,068

Post History

Post
#1178304
Topic
<strong>Solo</strong> : A Star Wars Story - film &amp; fan art, + covers etc
Time

^ from https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsLeaks/comments/81p1wc/solo_textless_posters_combined_into_one_big_banner/

 

some textless individual banners of those above can be found here:-

https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsLeaks/comments/81jufc/solo_high_resolution_textless_character_posters/

 

a new Japanese poster:-

an English text version can be found here:-

http://www.uruloki.org/felipeblog/imagenes2018/20180302-han-solo-star-wars.jpg

Post
#1177974
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.

A single thread page and only 3 days previous does not constitute “old”.

Also “the start if the topic”? Do you mean the thread OP; or the beginning of that string of conversation? Because Random Thoughts are random, and not only was DE’s comment the beginning of that conversational string, but also Frink (seemingly) didn’t/doesn’t understand either. So in either case of what you meant, reading back through is irrelevant.

In the context of it being ‘old’ as in it is not a current discussion. And, yes a 3 day old post would constitute an old post (for me, anyway).

Also yes, the start of the topic does mean ‘the beginning of that string of conversation’, as you put it.

No, it’s not irrelevant - it’s good practice for posting on a forum in general, yes?

So you’re saying that if I visit the forum regularly but don’t read a particular thread for a few days, and the topic of conversation since last viewing doesn’t span more than a couple pages at best, I am still not eligible to remark on something someone said?

No, that’s not what I am saying at all.

I said ‘you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about’.

Post
#1177935
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

chyron8472 said:

oojason said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.

A single thread page and only 3 days previous does not constitute “old”.

Also “the start if the topic”? Do you mean the thread OP; or the beginning of that string of conversation? Because Random Thoughts are random, and not only was DE’s comment the beginning of that conversational string, but also Frink (seemingly) didn’t/doesn’t understand either. So in either case of what you meant, reading back through is irrelevant.

In the context of it being ‘old’ as in it is not a current discussion. And, yes a 3 day old post would constitute an old post (for me, anyway).

Also yes, the start of the topic does mean ‘the beginning of that string of conversation’, as you put it.

No, it’s not irrelevant - it’s good practice for posting on a forum in general, yes?

Post
#1177924
Topic
Politics 2: Electric Boogaloo
Time

Mrebo said:

oojason said:

Mrebo said:

Death and violence is not going to end, subject to a total remaking of the world.

Indeed mate - though many places in the world thankfully don’t have as many (or anywhere near the number of) school shootings.

We should focus on making schools safe! For the particular story I’m commenting on, would we rather this domestic dispute happened off campus? Sure, but I don’t think that’s the most important thing that happened her. Nor would I have been more pleased if a car or knife had been used.

The inference was that maybe US schools should take a look at other schools and countries around the world - and ask why they have fewer school shootings.

And the shooting at the Michigan School is not a domestic dispute - going on the news report that Collipso linked to it happened at school, yes?

The better outcome is to not have a dispute with guns involved at all, right?

Post
#1177908
Topic
Random Thoughts
Time

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

dahmage said:

chyron8472 said:

TV’s Frink said:

Ok.

So why would you hate it then?

Why don’t you do another armchair diagnosis?

No. Bitter, are we?

lol, see.

but no, really, i just don’t know why you choose to return in this way. Meaning, you dug out a several day old post about a nonsense topic and started asking about it. I assume you had a reason other than antagonizing?

Because it was on the previous page? Because not everyone reads everything everyone says on a forum as soon as they are posted? Because this is the Random Thoughts thread?

Take your pick.

Maybe when you’re quoting old posts and asking questions of people, then you should read back to the start of the topic you’re actually posting about.

Post
#1177163
Topic
Blu-Ray and other HD box size STAR WARS covers
Time

joshuabri said:

Does anyone have working links to Harmy’s Blu-ray covers? The links on the first page aren’t working for me. The only one I can find with a Google image search is Episode IV.

Yes mate:-

Printable covers and disc art can be found here:
http://uloz.to/xSSTDNW/deed-v1-0-covers-rar

 

they are linked to in Harmy’s own threads in the ‘Star Wars Preservations and Other Fan Projects’ section too 😃

 

There is also a copy of the 3 covers up on imgur, here - https://imgur.com/gallery/TaXOM