logo Sign In

SilverWook

User Group
Moderators
Join date
9-Dec-2004
Last activity
6-Apr-2023
Posts
22,080

Post History

Post
#581880
Topic
George Lucas leaves Lucasfilm
Time

danny_boy said:

Robert Wise made major changes to  Star Trek: The Motion Picture for that film's release on DVD in 2001/01 whilst the theatrical version was withheld from DVD home video------ until it was released on bluray in 2009----- but Wise did not  get rebuked as much as Lucas in that time period.

Only the 1992 director's cut of Blade Runner was released on DVD in 1997/98(and a poor quality transfer at that)-----the theatrical version would not surface on high definition home video (and standard def DVD?) until 2007 -----but did Ridley Scott get as much abuse as Lucas has done in those years----- I don't think so.

 

TMP is not the most beloved film by Trek fans. It was also well known the film was rushed to meet the release date. Prints were actually shipped "wet". The "special longer version" that aired on ABC was the version most widely available on video in the 80's and 90's.

Blade Runner was not considered a success in the summer of E.T. The cult following was small, and only grew a bit more after the '92 revival caused people to reassess the movie. I don't think the changes were as well known in exhausting detail as with the OT.

In both cases, we have all the versions now in reasonable quality. With the exception that Paramount screwed up by not paying to have the DE effects rendered in HD. There was no level of intentional P.R. blue smoke and mirrors equal to that we've gotten from Lucasfilm since 1997.

 

Post
#581850
Topic
Info: Re-mixed audio tracks on video releases
Time

Wanted to mention I am getting the remastered pan and scan Grease LD. (My best offer was accepted and the seller had another disc I wanted.)

I look forward to cranking the original soundtrack mix on my HT setup. I've been on a bit of a 70's musical kick lately. Watched the infamous Sgt. Pepper's movie last week, which has a wonderful DTS track that seems faithful to the original mix, AFAIK.

Post
#581618
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

Not sure as it's been a while. The LD set was too expensive for me when it was new, so I just rented it.

http://www.lddb.com/laserdisc/05203/ID7413MG/Private-Life-of-Sherlock-Holmes-The:-Special-Edition-%281970%29

I was misinformed about the DVD not having any of the extras apparently.

http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/7074/private-life-of-sherlock-holmes-the/

The LD has some uncensored naughty bits that were blurred on the DVD.

Post
#581553
Topic
Monty Python and the Holy Grail -- 1975 theatrical (on hiatus - lots of info)
Time

Two other things to consider including. The original theatrical trailer would be a simple edit to do. (Using the Criterion LD as a guide.) The added bit for the reissue touting the stereo soundtrack after the Japanese eatery scene is easy enough to cut, and you might be able to clean up the distributor logo at the end of the LD trailer enough to be usable. (I think the trailer even on the Blu Ray is SD?)

Also, the Criterion has some nice animated graphic intros to the still gallery and trailer you might want to use. The stills from the DVD could be inserted over the lower quality LD images.

Anyway, it's just an idea! :)

Post
#581548
Topic
Last movie seen
Time

captainsolo said:

The Private Life of Sherlock Holmes

I love this little movie, and every time I revisit it I lament that Billy Wilder's roadshow epic was butchered, and the fact that Christopher Lee never gets the respect an actor of his caliber does.

Even though it began life as a musical (With Peter O'Toole and Peter Sellers no less!) and takes a slightly comedic look at what-if's in the life of Holmes & Watson; the look, tone, pacing and performers absolutely nail it.Plus it has a certain touching quality that is nowhere to be found in the mess that is Sherlock Holmes 2: A Game of Shadows. (though I still love Jude Law's stronger characterization of Watson. The only good part of these pointless fake-looking films.)

There were originally 4 stories in a 200 minute roadshow with intermission, with two being removed and strangely making the film seem longer than just 125 minutes. Still it is the best Holmes film to date (even being a purist for Holmes adaptations) and the best from Wilder's late period. What does it say that the best film adaptations of Conan Doyle are those that are unafraid to go into uncharted territory and maintain a strong spirit? (the other being Hammer's Hound of the Baskervilles)

4 balls out of 4 canaries, trappist monks, parasols, Nessies and Russian ballerinas.

I'm surprised nobody has attempted a lost Dr. Who episode type of reconstruction, using the Laserdisc extras. Sadly, they were not included on the DVD.

Post
#581510
Topic
"Classic Star Wars" Comic Collections: Should I get them?
Time

No Coruscant celebration, or Tatooine denizens dancing in 120 degree heat? ;)

It's possible they went to press before getting to see all the SE changes, or Lucasfilm wanted to keep a couple things under wraps. IIRC, Marvel was asked not to show the Wampa's face or the asteroid slug back in the day.

Post
#581505
Topic
5-25-77 Documentary
Time

Tobar said:

SilverWook said:

It isn't a Star Wars geek film, since the fandom didn't really exist in early 1977.

You'll just have to see it. ;)

I think I catch your drift, so I'll refine it to mean not geeky the way Fanboys was. Those who were there at the beginning sensed Star Wars was going to be something special, but that's all we knew. ;)

One thing I took away from the trailer is the main character is driven by that desire to create that is often difficult for others to understand. (Something a lot of us here can relate to.) That's one aspect any promotion ought to emphasize.