Hal 9000 said:
My early experience with The Force Awakens was somewhat disappointing, as what I was really hoping for was Luke. The film did well capturing the tone and atmosphere of the original trilogy, though without a great deal of mythical substance. However, the film was a fun ride, if not wholly original, and it ended with the promise of a whole lotta Luke in the next movie.
Now that The Last Jedi has come out, after effectively four years or so of building up Luke Skywalker for me, this new film feels like a slap in the face. I do not mean in terms of the film’s quality, but as a deliberate thematic gesture. I question whether this was the right move to make, as it seems obvious Mark Hamill has, though the film is more or less successful in what it seeks to do in this regard. However, it comes across as deeply incongruous with the films that came before, most strikingly with The Force Awakens itself. It is baffling to me, and seems to betray the story that film was trying to set up. I don’t care about Rey’s parents being nobodies; I rather like that decision. I would have liked to see Snoke be tied into the saga at large in some way, but I don’t really have a problem with him being axed, aside from the incongruity with the storytelling of TFA.
Basically, the Luke stuff is very hard to swallow and feels very wrong for a variety of reasons. And the rest of the movie is dominated by SNL-level humor and ‘Droids’ cartoony silliness. Finn and Rose are grating, and BB8 commandeering an AT-ST is almost on the level of C-3PO in the Geonosian droid factory. The pacing and plot structure is all over the place. If I could edit apart the film into Rey’s story and everyone else’s story, I might be able to digest it a little easier. As much as I dislike Yoda’s visuals, his scene is touching, and goes the furthest to help Luke grow in this film. I still do not really understand how the lesson about accepting and learning from failure leads to Luke’s confrontation at the end. Does anyone else? It seems like he is sacrificing himself so the Resistance can escape, but I am straining to connect the dots to form a throughline with Luke.
Also, this movie suffers greatly in my mind by having several too many fakeouts or misdirections. Having what looks like a spaceship turn out to be an iron in the laundry room is one thing, but the movie contains so many of these that it honestly made me feel like a fucking idiot by the end, and left me almost giving up on trying to understand it. After Kylo Ren’s dialogue about letting the past die and the ship being rammed, the clear implication seemed to be that all the main characters aboard were killed in a stunning narrative mood. (Just kidding; here’s BB8 in an AT-ST.) Finn is about to sacrifice himself to save the Resistance. (Just kidding, you silly goose.) Rose dies. (Just kidding, I guess… I honestly forgot she didn’t die until I saw it again because there’s too much of this going on!)
There’s several of these even in the Yoda scene alone: Luke says he’s going to burn the tree down, then hesitates and seems to feel remorse about having wanted to. Then Yoda blows it up and laughs, confirming to Luke that, no, he was actually right in the first place to burn it down. Luke appears to accept this from Yoda, then becomes very defensive for a second about the Jedi texts. Yoda seems to tell Luke that the texts are better off gone, implying Rey already has what she needs without them. (JUST KIDDING; the Jedi texts are aboard the Falcon at the end in a shot I completely missed after seeing the film twice. What does this shot suggest about the Yoda scene, and Luke’s dialogue ABOUT Rey becoming a Jedi??? Does Luke KNOW she has the texts? Does Yoda?)
This movie makes me feel like I am locked in the house of mirrors and the Joker is laughing at me. They won’t even let me read the novelization until late March. Even if someone explains all these things to me in as best a way as can be done, this movie will always be a problem.
I agree with a lot of this, especially the scatterbrained tone. Star Wars has always had a very specific tone and editorial style, and TLJ is definitely the furthest removed from this style. All of the films have a noticeably passive, even documentary style at times. Abram’s filmmaking is somewhat removed from this in his use of quick cuts, closeups and dynamic camera movement, but TFA is still quite restrained in this regard. The Last Jedi by comparison is frenetic in how it slices up scenes to ratchet up the tension, and it breaks the illusion of watching events in a faraway galaxy and instead forces the viewer to confront the film as merely an assemblage of shots intended to show (or even worse, tell) the audience what to feel.
Canto Bight is the most egregious example of this style. I remember during filming how leaked photos showed elaborate streets built on location and a vast game floor filled with a breathtaking array of stunning aliens. I had an immediate sense of place with these photos, a location that promised to linger in the mind just as Cloud City, Dagobah, or even Coruscant lingered long after the movie ended. However, when I saw the finished product I had forgotten this lush environment the moment our heroes left. This is entirely a problem with the style of filming and editing these sequences.
The Luke stuff on the other hand I appreciate. Luke is a disillusioned old man who was failed by the dogmatic Jedi religion and held up as an impossibly godlike figure by the rest of the galaxy; no wonder he left. The beautiful thing about his disillusionment is that it both humanizes him and makes him more like a Zen spiritual guru. His ‘reach out’ joke might have been motivated by a cynicism of everything Jedi, but it also functions as a genuine lesson on not taking one’s teachers too seriously.