logo Sign In

MJR80

User Group
Members
Join date
1-Feb-2005
Last activity
5-Jan-2016
Posts
85

Post History

Post
#893406
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

I’m almost finished with TFA novel. It has much more dialogue and scenes than the film (as books usually do). Snoke, in a conversation with Ren and Hux, specifically states that one of the major reasons why the Starkiller Base was built was to get the Resistance out from hiding. I don’t have the quote on me, but it does shed light as to why the base was built, and why it had an obvious weak point.

Post
#891403
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Bingowings said:

So who is this Smoke then? Someone new or a mask concealing someone very old?

Not sure if anyone has said this, but:

If you play the Darth Plagues (spelling?) opera song (I cannot remember what is called) and Snoke’s music from TFA, it’s almost the same. Not sure if this is coincidence, but it’s interesting, to state the least.

Post
#889956
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

pablumatic said:

Had there actually been a new threat to the galaxy, rather than just the Empire with a public relations name change and a large bucket of black paint for their spaceships, it would have worked better for me.

As it is, somehow the Rebels didn’t really win and the Empire managed to sneak off and make an even bigger Death Star.

My hope for the final two movies of this sequel trilogy is that we do finally see an end to the Empire/First Order. No jumping off point to more sequels with Stormtroopers and black robed figures with red lightsabers. At least give me that.

I understand what you’re saying, but history does repeat itself. After Alexander the Great died, his empire fell to pieces, often waring over power. In recent history, the Soviet Union fell, only to become something as powerful some twenty years later (Russia), who is, in some ways, succeeding in becoming the power it once was. In many ways, this is like the Empire falling, only to rise out of the ashes the First Order.

I can see how some folks would be upset about re-using the Death Star plot point; however, again, this mimics history. For example, modern nukes are many times more powerful than the A-bombs used during WWII. But are they not essentially the same weapon, only far more powerful (much like the Starkiller Base is in TFA)? Why wouldn’t the First Order want a weapon as powerful as that? And who is to say building such a weapon wasn’t a ploy (and a plot device in the next two films) to lure Luke from hiding?

Last, I have read folks complaining about the Galaxy “forgetting” history in TFA. This again can have roots in reality. There are societies with totalitarian regimes who recreate history on a whim (North Korea, anyone?). Is it not plausible that the First Order, with its power and influence can and would attempt to rewrite history for some (Finn) and erase it altogether for others (Rey)?

Like I said in a previous post, I DID NOT leave TPM in '99 ecstatic. I remember feeling dread and thinking how bored I was. And, although I never bashed the film, I never found much to defend about it, unlike the way I feel about TFA.

Post
#888870
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

I had mixed feelings when I first learned of the Starkiller Base. I don’t know if this has been posted, but does anyone else think it was all a set-up by Snoke? Unless the New Order is completely stupid, it makes sense that this would be the thing to lure Luke out of hiding. In other words, Snoke isn’t above wasting resources, manpower, and Resistance systems and planets to track down one man. It seems like a Sith thing to do.

Post
#888299
Topic
Episode VII: The Force Awakens - Discussion * <strong>SPOILER THREAD</strong> *
Time

Off subject a bit, but does anyone think the following?

Finn is a Solo (read the new comics-Han was married before the '77 movie to a woman of color), thus making Finn and Ren half-brothers.

Rey is a Kenobi, not a Skywalker (maybe Obiwan’s granddaughter). I only say this because of the voices she hears during her flashback (but she also heard Yoda’s as well).

Snoke is Darth Plageus.

Discuss.

Post
#304871
Topic
The Dark Knight (Batman Begins Returns Again)
Time
Originally posted by: Gaffer Tape
You can say a lot of things about The Joker's new look, but metrosexual certainly isn't one of them. I can't imagine any gay man (and I know quite a few) venturing outside looking like that. As for Queer Eye, I can only imagine the guys from that show rushing off to give The Joker a makeover...


I agree. This version of Joker, in my opinion, seems a bit more realistic than the others... If you study real-life pyschos, like John Wayne Gacy and Ed Gein, they dressed in makeup and other "items" (I'll let you research those items for yourself) when doing their heinous activities... I believe Nolan may use this element to make Ledger's Joker more sinister and believable.

Good stuff!
Post
#303074
Topic
The Prequels r sooo much more better that the original
Time
Originally posted by: {DoS}Hellhound<
i dont need yer pitty thank u im not a govt puppet like u


Yes, we are all puppets here... Mere puppets. Nothing more. (Sarcasm ensues.)

These two puppets say, "Leave! Now!"

http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f37/MJR1980/Muppets.jpg

P.S. I do find some irony in the fact that you site "Freedom of Speech" in a previous post, which is an amendment of the Bill of Rights. Yet, you then proceed to call us "govt puppets", and seemingly mock the very government that spawned such an imperative document... (I am assuming that you are American. If not, it is my mistake.)
Post
#302909
Topic
The Prequels r sooo much more better that the original
Time
Of course you're able to express an opinion here. Just do not be surprised if your opinion is attacked. Second, do not take offense when your lack of correct grammar and butchery of the English language is ridiculed. Third, knowledge on how to spell certain names of characters, such as “Anakin”, is crucial when introducing an argument. (Again, no astonishment should be taken by you.) Lastly, do not feel miffed that members will probably scorn that your knowledge of "Freedom of Speech" is completely misunderstood. "Freedom of Speech" is limited, especially in public forums such as this. “Freedom of Speech” does not mean “Freedom to ‘Express’ Whatever I Want, When I Want, Where I Want- Even in Public Forums”. If you are "censored", it is not due to a violation of your "rights"; it is due to this forum, as a public forum, has limitations to that right. Crack open a law book- it’s all legit.

Take care, and happy trolling.
Post
#301606
Topic
A New Thought on George
Time
After reading On Writing, by Stephen King, I remember an interesting section on where he (King) explains that he and many other artist write for certain people. In King's example, he states that he does not write for himself, but for his wife (Tabitha King). If she does not think something is correct, he explains, she'll point it out, and sometimes ruthlessly. I have also heard that Alfred Hitchcock had the same with his wife, who gave him an actual unbiased view of such classics as Psycho and The Birds, when everyone else didn't notice the same things she did. In other words, many different storytellers of different genres had/ have a muse to whom they write to, other than themselves. Since Lucas is single, seemingly does not have a serious love, and states constantly that he told the PT to showcase his "vision", is it possible that one of the reasons that the PT lacked good writing and good storytelling is because there was no one telling Lucas, "Hey, George, this sucks..." or "Look, this creates a paradox..."? It seems as though the man is surrounded by nothing but "Yes Men" (not the best thing to have when attempting to create a grand opus).
Post
#301484
Topic
Prequelize the OT
Time
This is not a scene from the OT, but I imagine it as a deleted scene from Ep. III:

Anakin and Padme are alone in their secret downtown Coruscant apartment. The war has given both much stress, and the distance has strained their relationship. Anakin is sitting in the living room, watching the latest news clip of his latest heroic action. Padme stomps in, obviously distressed.

Padme: "Are you going to watch that stupid holographic box all day? I told you we're out of food... When are you going to the store?"

Anakin: "As soon as this news clip is over, my precious drop of water."

Padme: (Folding her arms.) "That's what you said after the last clip!"

Anakin: (A bit annoyed that he cannot hear the announcer over her voice.) "Well, I meant this one, my love."

Padme stomps towards the hologram box, yanks a few power cords, and says, "Guess what? News clip is over, I'm pregnant, and we're hungry... Guess who's getting us something to eat?"

Anakin: Anakin sighs, and begins to smirk in a seductive way. "Sugar comet, it's okay. Let me hold you like I did on the lakes of Naboo-"

Padme: "Don't you "Sugar comet" me, Ani. I'm starving... Get me something... Now!"

Anakin: "But blueberry!"

Padme: "Anakin."

Anakin: "Yes, my love?"

Padme: "Shut up and get me some chocolate."

Anakin: "Yes, dear..."
Post
#300118
Topic
How did you envision the prequels?
Time
After watching Star Trek: Nemesis the other night, it occurred to me that, although the movie failed in some areas, it was excellent in others. To expound upon something I stated earlier on this thread, I believe that a good, central villain (notice how it's not plural) is crucial to a good story, Nemesis, with all its faults as a film, succeeded in having a great villain, Shinzon. Shinzon was intimidating, charming, hateful, vengeful, intelligent, dark, mysterious, articulate, and, above all, had ties in with some of the major characters in some crucial way... The villains from the PT lacked these. In my opinion, the only villain who came close was Dooku, but, with so little screen time, the guy had no time to show the audience who and what he was about. In other words, I would have loved to have seen a wonderful villain, such as was not given in the PT.

P.S. I know that mentioning Star Trek in a Star Wars website is a bit taboo; but hey, I enjoy all kinds of sci-fi.
Post
#299761
Topic
How did you envision the prequels?
Time
To answer the primary question, as others have said before, I envisioned the PT to be a bit darker (albeit that Ep. III was dark, but it was a little too late). Ep. I was a "laugh fest" (and I'm stating that very loosely), and Ep. II seemed to be more-or-less a filler of a movie... Nonetheless, I felt as though this dark story would have had a large dark and sinister over and undertone. We didn't get that at all.

I also wished to see more of one main “mobile” villain or “side villain”, like Darth Maul, explored more. Instead, we were introduced to a new side villain in every film. Honestly, it got a bit redundant and confusing. Half the time I remember asking myself, "Who's this guy? Why is he here? What relationship does he bring to the overall story?"

Also, I would have liked to see Anakin older, Palpatine would not be in the Senate, but more of an enigma, much as he was in the OT.
Post
#299491
Topic
How did you envision the prequels?
Time
Originally posted by: C3PX
Originally posted by: MJR80
Given, other storytellers, such as Tolkien, have broken this rule as well (such is the case with Tom Bombadil, who I believe to be the Jar-Jar of LOTR). Tolkien was a master storyteller, but the character of Bombadil has been criticized much since his appearance. (Thank God Jackson cut him from the film.)


I don't think Tolkien gave a flying donkey for the rules of story telling. But as for Bombadil being the Jar Jar of The Lord of the Rings, keep in mind that Bombadil lasted for little more than one chapter, not the entire story. And for the time he was in the story he contributed a great deal by aiding the traveling Hobbits. Unlike Jar Jar, who is merely just there and contributes nothing to anyone but yet manages to be in nearly every scene of the film. I never heard too many people complaining about old Tom until after the movies came out, then suddenly he became a gay and annoying character that was cool to hate. Tolkien often side tracked and spent some time on a side character, or sometimes on a character that has nothing to do with the story at all, such as the moments where he goes into a tangent about some historical figure. If you are not into that sort of thing, you can't truely appreciate the brilliance of Tolkien's work, that is why I always say Tolkien is not for everyone. He doesn't conform to the rules of story telling, he probably breaks just about every one of them, but yet his works never goes out of print and have held a huge fan base ever since the very beginning.

Lucas broke plenty of rules too, and in all fairness, his work has a pretty decent sized fan base too. Though I am very interesting to see how SW is fairing in ten - twenty years.


I wasn't criticizing Tolkien; I was merely attempting to state that all storytellers sometimes break the "rules”, including the masters. I love Tolkien's work.

I should have been more articulate in what I was trying to say, but no harm done.

Post
#299436
Topic
How did you envision the prequels?
Time

There are a few rules to good storytelling, and Lucas, with the PT broke many of them.

First rule: One must always SHOW, not TELL things about characters (it is different, however, for plot changes). Merely stating that two characters are friends or are in love is not enough. Show it, don't tell it... Obi Wan and Anakin, as we're told, are "friends". However, that isn't evident until ROTS, and even then it's still a bit lacking. We're told that Anakin and Padme are in love, but merely stating something does not make it true...

Second rule: Never dedicate too much attention on minor characters who add little-to-nothing to the plot. Lucas, especially in TPM, focused much on Jar-Jar. The character not only was annoying, but wasted time on screen... He added nothing to the plot, story, and so-on. Given, other storytellers, such as Tolkien, have broken this rule as well (such is the case with Tom Bombadil, who I believe to be the Jar-Jar of LOTR). Tolkien was a master storyteller, but the character of Bombadil has been criticized much since his appearance. (Thank God Jackson cut him from the film.)

Third rule: Never let the gems (i.e. landscape, music, etc) steal from the story (or in this case, steal from the film). These components are meant to be positive endowments to the story, not overshadow it. The PT is not remembered for story, but for its components (e.g. the action, cgi, etc).

There are many other rules, but these three reigns supreme when I think about the PT...

Post
#298771
Topic
Anything? Anything At All? (that is remotely positive or good about the SE and PT?)
Time

Is there anything, in your opinion, that is remotely positive or good about the SE and PT? Understand that I have done much Lucas, SE, and PT “bashing” in the past; however, I must admit that there are some okay-to-brilliant moments in the PT (such as the lightsaber duels and much of John Williams’ score), and some not-so-bad moments in the SE (some of the crisper special effects). Does anyone else have an opinion on this?

Post
#298764
Topic
Caption Fun
Time
Here's something that's a little different and fun. Post a random Star Wars related photograph/picture and the next poster(s) will write some kind of diologue/ caption to accompany it. If anything, we'll get a few laughts.

I'll start one out:

http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f37/MJR1980/600px-Vadergrandadmirals.jpg

VADER: "This is the holographic image the doctor took of my left testicle yesterday at my appointment... You see that round thing? That's the giant boil that's been creating that damn irritation I've been telling you about... (Vader waves his right arm violently in the air.) Damn this cyborg armor! I can't scratch it!"