Handman

Possessed said:

Warbler said:

The 2nd one was a double post, I have deleted it.

You sure are alot of fun!

You’re a lot of fun too.

Fairly seamless.

And here it is in the Grindhouse Edition for comparison.

TV’s Frink said:

As far as I can see it’s 60 minutes of some guy talking about Garfield. Unless I’ve missed something, how is that a movie?

It’s a commentary on our post modern world, setting its sights on the very idea of criticism with biting irony and satire, without a hint of sarcasm that so often befalls other works of parody. It employs actors, production design, uses the entire Philip Glass score for Kundun, and in a similar vein to Best Picture winner Birdman and Alfred Hitchcock’s Rope, uses a single, unbroken take. It’s production values are high enough to be considered a professional effort, I don’t know what to really call it if not a movie, it is certainly art of some kind.

TV’s Frink said:

Handman said:

07/27/1978
An hour long analysis of a Garfield comic strip. This changes everything.

I’m sorry but just because something is an hour long doesn’t make it a movie.

Please define it then, and be careful not to exclude things like Koyaanisqatsi and My Dinner with Andre.

Alderaan said:

Sorry, I try to stay out of the new film threads to not hijack them with negative comments, as I know some of you will like these awful films and that’s your right.

Perhaps people would be more receptive to your criticisms if you didn’t word your awful comments so poorly, but as you said, that’s your right.

Social media seems to be outraged.

This line made me laugh. When is it not?

07/27/1978
An hour long analysis of a Garfield comic strip. This changes everything.

Possessed said:

To get a nonanamorphic 4:3 sd transfer to look better than a1080p blu ray? Yeah that’d be a pretty bitchin laserdisc player

It works with some Disney films.

I never had a VHS tape with artwork like that on it. They usually kept colors to a minimum, right?

If he puts the slide in before the film, he can correct to the one slide to remove any casts the camera creates and therefore, accurate colors to the print.

Though, I’d assume the slide would need to be of the same film stock, right? Wouldn’t the camera create different casts to different stocks?

DominicCobb said:

I’m everyday more sure of the idea that we’ll see them for both parties in 2020.

What?

Biden would be almost 80 years old at that point, he’d enter office older than when Reagan left. I’m not sure about that. I mean, 70 is pretty much the new 50 for these politicians, but 80 seems remarkably older.

DominicCobb said:

Why do I even visit this site

Fan preservations?

Handman said:

That poster looks like anything I get when I mess with the color curve of any image. I don’t like it.

To further prove my point.

I thought Han was just beefing up his own reputation in the original movie to impress Ben and Luke, hence Ben’s amused eyebrow raise here:

TFA kind of threw that out by taking the stuff said in that scene literally, though, which might be my biggest complaint with it.

Ryan McAvoy said:

Jetrell Fo said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Trump has managed to find a base so stupid that he can say and do anything and they’ll keep right on supporting him.

If you think 1 person has cornered the market on stupid, talk to Bernie Sanders, ask him how he feels about being cheated by his own people.

😉 (a wink in jest)

Joking or not, it’s not a valid comparison. Sanders “base” were not thrilled when he was doing things like endorsing Hillary. Trump’s base would just keep cheering him no matter what.

Just to make sure, are you insinuating Trump’s base would still cheer him if he endorsed Hillary? I thought most of his campaign was run on the fact that he wasn’t Hillary.

DuracellEnergizer said:

Freaky both ways.

Mein Führer, I can dance.

I remember these films most fondly with the 2002 sets, when I went to watch the '09 Wrath of Khan Blu-ray, something was seriously off-putting about it, it wasn’t what I remembered enjoying so much. I expect the others would recieve the same reaction.

That poster looks like anything I get when I mess with the color curve of any image. I don’t like it.

What did you do to the cases?

Would there be anything left?

DuracellEnergizer said:

Handman said:

Allow me to contribute.

Katharine Hepburn

Damn, that’s a good photo of her.

It better be, I spent a good 10 minutes looking for it. She’s a remarkable woman.

Allow me to contribute.

Katharine Hepburn

Cyd Charisse

My rankings:

1. Batman Mask of the Phantasm
2. Batman: The Movie (1966)
3. Batman (1989)
4. Batman Beyond: Return of the Joker
5. The Dark Knight
6. Batman Under the Red Hood
7. Batman Begins
8. Batman Returns
9. Batman Forever
10. The Dark Knight Rises
    11-100. Random Direct-to-Video schlock
11. Batman & Robin

Any other significant releases I haven’t seen. I’m passing entirely on DC’s new movie series, as you can see I like some camp in my movies. But it has to be good.

The forum software is putting Batman & Robin at 11 when I wrote 101. Stop interfering with my posts.

I enjoy Yakety Sax.