logo Sign In

Orusaka

User Group
Members
Join date
24-Sep-2004
Last activity
14-Sep-2011
Posts
3

Post History

Post
#535862
Topic
Star Wars Blu Ray Impressions
Time

Okay, so some impressions. I'm in Europe and picked up the set when it was released here on Monday, just to get any potential question of how I obtained it out of the way.

I haven't really gotten around to watching the movies yet, and who knows when I might, but I have watched most of the bonus features, and I'm left with only one singular emotion. Disappointment.  There are 2 reasons I'm disappointed. Firstly, the very vast majority of the content is presented in SD. On the archival discs the material is presented in a pretty tiny window with huge painted mattes around it.

 Secondly, and more importantly, perhaps, is that the content that is there is not very interesting. The interviews that are presented are all taken from various behind-the-scenes documentaries that have been on previous dvd-releases. As for the deleted scenes, they are a bit of a mixed bag. I will agree with the people who have announced them as underwhelming. It's been a long time since I watched any of the prequal-dvds, but I don't remember any of the deleted scenes for those movies on there, so I guess that's something. On the other hand, they presented in very poor SD quality, from what looks like workprint VHS with animatics standing in for visual effects. The deleted scenes from the original trilogy are all over the place. Some are faded black & white, some are crisp black & white, some are fuzzy colour shots. None have been cleaned up in any way. They are scratchy and dirty.

The only good thing I possibly could say is that the new documentaries on the last disc are in HD.

Oh, also, the alternate audio commentaries seem to be resembled mostly from what was left over from the main commentary. As in, because they edited several people who gave full commentaries together to one track, there was obviously a lot left over, and that seems to have been put in the new alternate ones. I watched some of ESB and most of the track is Kershner announcing what's going on.

 

Post
#67014
Topic
Star Wars, The Beatles, and the desecration of our cultural heritage
Time
I know that you use noise-reduction to remove tape noise. I was implying that a lot of George's riffs couldn't be heard properly beacuse of the tape noise. I agree that the Get Back bootleg is fantastic, but I prefer Let it be: naked simply because of the incredible superiority in sound. But you have to love Save the last dance for me on the bootleg, though.

I can to a certain degree agree with with you on the marketing of the album as the band's original cut. Of course this couldn't be so, seeing as the band never made a cut. They could of course publish Glys Johns version, but I'm really happy with naked. As long as we agree that the Phil Spector version is utter rubbish, and impossible to listen to, I'm happy.
Post
#66955
Topic
Star Wars, The Beatles, and the desecration of our cultural heritage
Time
Wow! To think that a post comapring the beatles to star wars would be what finally got me to sign up. First let me say that I totally disagree with you on the subject matter. As a majoy beatles fan I of course would also like to see the albums reissued with newly remastered sound, but I completely disagree with you on your comments on the later albums. I can't really speak for the remastering of the Yellow Submarine album, seeing as I don't own the reissue, only the 1987 original cd-version. (and LP of course) But when it comes to Let it be: naked, that is the way the album should have been! The noise-reduction on it is done so wonderfully, that you can now even hear the little riffs George does on One after 909. It's just truly magnificent. Personally I think it's amazing how much de-Spectorizing it would bring it to a level where you can stand to listen to it. Let it be used to be my least favourite Beatles album, just because of the way Phil Spector totally raped both the idea and sound of the album. With Let i be: naked it was suddenly my favourite album, and continues to be, pushing Abbey Road to a good second. One could of course argue that using different takes is stupid, but having heard most of the Let it be recording sessions through bootleg, I find the newly selected takes to be vastly superior to the ones Phil chose. If you want the original cut, however, it is available as a bootleg. Just look for Glys Johns second edition Get Back. But be warned, Let it be: naked is better. At least in my opinion.