The imperialscum "Furiously Doing His Taxes" Thread — Page 17

imperialscum said:

Frank your Majesty said:

imperialscum said:

They can increase a chance to become unhealthy, but it doesn’t make you automatically unhealthy as idiots tried to claim.

Even if an individual person is healthy under these circumstances, it’s still an unhealthy lifestyle and idolizing such a person also promotes this lifestyle, which will lead to other people becoming unhealthy due to the statistically proven correlation of this lifestyle and various diseases.

What exactly is “unhealthy lifestyle”? For an unfavourable variation/specimen it can simply be being born and living. As I said, statistics is completely useless here.

I think that statistics are useful here. Statistics are useful in telling the likelihood that a smoker may get lung cancer, so why not in this case?

imperialscum said:

What exactly is “unhealthy lifestyle”? For an unfavourable variation/specimen it can simply be being born and living as even the mild environmental conditions will cause unsustainable damage. On the other hand, a strong specimen can withstand extreme environmental conditions without any long-term damage. As I said, statistics is completely useless here.

A lifestyle that has a high correlation to a disease in otherwise healthy individuals. For example smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, shooting heroin, being anorexic, being morbidly obese.
If you tell people it’s ok to smoke since you know that one guy who lived 100 years while being a heavy smoker, people following that advice will statistically more often die of lung cancer than people who don’t smoke.

Frank your Majesty said:

imperialscum said:

What exactly is “unhealthy lifestyle”? For an unfavourable variation/specimen it can simply be being born and living as even the mild environmental conditions will cause unsustainable damage. On the other hand, a strong specimen can withstand extreme environmental conditions without any long-term damage. As I said, statistics is completely useless here.

A lifestyle that has a high correlation to a disease in otherwise healthy individuals. For example smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, shooting heroin, being anorexic, being morbidly obese.
If you tell people it’s ok to smoke since you know that one guy who lived 100 years while being a heavy smoker, people following that advice will statistically more often die of lung cancer than people who don’t smoke.

Cogent. Great post.

imperialscum said:

Lord Haseo said:

That’s like if I said people in the UK should pronounce “garage” like the civilized people do in the states. It’s a bunch of pretentious shite.

It doesn’t work that way. When savages take a civilised language and use it improperly, you cannot blame the civilised language users for that.

I’d take savagery any day if imperialscum is a representation of civilization.

Frank your Majesty said:

imperialscum said:

What exactly is “unhealthy lifestyle”? For an unfavourable variation/specimen it can simply be being born and living as even the mild environmental conditions will cause unsustainable damage. On the other hand, a strong specimen can withstand extreme environmental conditions without any long-term damage. As I said, statistics is completely useless here.

A lifestyle that has a high correlation to a disease in otherwise healthy individuals. For example smoking, excessive alcohol consumption, shooting heroin, being anorexic, being morbidly obese.
If you tell people it’s ok to smoke since you know that one guy who lived 100 years while being a heavy smoker, people following that advice will statistically more often die of lung cancer than people who don’t smoke.

I never disputed that something may be unhealthy lifestyle for some or even majority of specimen. I merely disputed that you cannot claim something is universally unhealthy lifestyle.

imperialscum said:

I never disputed that something may be unhealthy for some or even majority of specimen.

What was that about being civilized?

I merely disputed that you cannot claim something is universally unhealthy.

Being fat is never healthy.

moviefreakedmind said:

Being fat is never healthy.

What is your universal definition of fat?

I’m more into the definition of ‘phish’.

lol this thread got funny.

What do you expect after 410 replies and 17 pages?

More boring links to ImpScums posts?

You can’t compare Ric Olie and ImperialScum!

And fine! Have fun defending your empire against the filthy Millennial incursion with Hansig or something.

I thought that Frink said that this was ImperialScum’s masturbation thread. . . .

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/958883

Actual Literal

yhwx said:

I thought that Frink said that this was ImperialScum’s masturbation thread. . . .

You got that wrong…

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/956239

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

yhwx said:

I thought that Frink said that this was ImperialScum’s masturbation thread. . . .

You got that wrong…

http://originaltrilogy.com/post/id/956239

My thread about your masturbation. JEEZ!

Now now! There is nothing to be embarrassed about here. After all, you are turned on by great stuff.

Linking only feeds his masturbation.

yhwx said:

Linking only feeds his masturbation.

I know. But there is no way to stop him!

imperialscum said:

yhwx said:

Linking only feeds his masturbation.

I know. But there is no way to stop him!

I mean your masturbation. And your posts.

yhwx said:

imperialscum said:

yhwx said:

Linking only feeds his masturbation.

I know. But there is no way to stop him!

I mean your masturbation. And your posts.

You mean wrong.

It’s handy when he makes the posts in the thread itself. Don’t even need to link it.