logo Sign In

The Hobbit (2014) - Resource and idea thread — Page 3

Author
Time

fishmanlee said:

Just a note, the Lego Hobbit game has isolated sfx and voiceovers AND dialogue in the audio files for the game, they may be useful.

 That's actually really helpful to me! Thanks a lot!

Author
Time

I'm assuming you ripped the demo? The full game isn't available yet is it? (From legit sources at least). 

Author
Time

Sorry to dig up this old thread but it seems to be the most relevant.

I've just come back from a screening The Battle of the Five Armies in NZ and thought that some people might like to know that there's a "mini-documentary" on the front. The impression I got is that it's exclusive to NZ screenings, so it'll be interesting to see whether it makes it onto any home video release.

It runs for about five minutes and has Peter Jackson and many of the actors talking about the movies, all the friends they've made, etc, along with clips from the earlier films (including Lord of the Rings). It ends with the text "Thank You New Zealand".

The clip doesn't seem to be on YouTube at this point.

Author
Time

doubleofive said:

Peter Jackson on the two-film edit:

The split was going to occur where Bard [Luke Evans] appears on the river bank as a silhouetted figure with a bow. So the whole barrel sequence was going to be the climax.



Just in case someone wants to re-create the alternate universe two-movie edit.

 that would be cool along with cutting some bits out that weren't in ether the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings books, it might make for two roughly 3 hour films!

Author
Time

lotrjw said:

doubleofive said:

Peter Jackson on the two-film edit:

The split was going to occur where Bard [Luke Evans] appears on the river bank as a silhouetted figure with a bow. So the whole barrel sequence was going to be the climax.



Just in case someone wants to re-create the alternate universe two-movie edit.

 that would be cool along with cutting some bits out that weren't in ether the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings books, it might make for two roughly 3 hour films!

The old 90 minute Rankin/Bass Hobbit moved along at a pretty brisk pace without leaving TOO much out or adding lots of extra padding so still remains my favorite adaptation so far, but I still think Del Toro (or PJ) could have made one or even two REALLY amazing movies from this story on par with the LOTR films IF the focus actually remained on the title character of Bilbo instead of on Alfrid, Legolas, Kili/Tauriel, the white Orc, the White Council, etc. 

As it is, splitting this story into three bloated films has really killed this version as far as I'm concerned--a lot of the extra stuff in the films could have been added back in for the extended editions but should probably not have been left in for the more streamlined theatrical versions. 

I'm really looking forward to watching a shorter one or two movie edit and think it will do wonders for my prequelesque feelings of mehness about the current PJ versions.

Snip, Snap, Snorum…Hey, Kak, Kalorum!

Channel 73 WODS-TV

Author
Time

L.P. Hovercraft said:

lotrjw said:

doubleofive said:

Peter Jackson on the two-film edit:

The split was going to occur where Bard [Luke Evans] appears on the river bank as a silhouetted figure with a bow. So the whole barrel sequence was going to be the climax.



Just in case someone wants to re-create the alternate universe two-movie edit.

 that would be cool along with cutting some bits out that weren't in ether the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings books, it might make for two roughly 3 hour films!

The old 90 minute Rankin/Bass Hobbit moved along at a pretty brisk pace without leaving TOO much out or adding lots of extra padding so still remains my favorite adaptation so far, but I still think Del Toro (or PJ) could have made one or even two REALLY amazing movies from this story on par with the LOTR films IF the focus actually remained on the title character of Bilbo instead of on Alfrid, Legolas, Kili/Tauriel, the white Orc, the White Council, etc. 

As it is, splitting this story into three bloated films has really killed this version as far as I'm concerned--a lot of the extra stuff in the films could have been added back in for the extended editions but should probably not have been left in for the more streamlined theatrical versions. 

I'm really looking forward to watching a shorter one or two movie edit and think it will do wonders for my prequelesque feelings of mehness about the current PJ versions.

 I'm contemplating doing a edit that matches as best I can the pacing and events of the cartoon version. I might even make it full-screen. 

Author
Time

TheBoost 

The old 90 minute Rankin/Bass Hobbit moved along at a pretty brisk pace without leaving TOO much out or adding lots of extra padding so still remains my favorite adaptation so far, but I still think Del Toro (or PJ) could have made one or even two REALLY amazing movies from this story on par with the LOTR films IF the focus actually remained on the title character of Bilbo instead of on Alfrid, Legolas, Kili/Tauriel, the white Orc, the White Council, etc. 

As it is, splitting this story into three bloated films has really killed this version as far as I'm concerned--a lot of the extra stuff in the films could have been added back in for the extended editions but should probably not have been left in for the more streamlined theatrical versions. 

I'm really looking forward to watching a shorter one or two movie edit and think it will do wonders for my prequelesque feelings of mehness about the current PJ versions.

 I'm contemplating doing a edit that matches as best I can the pacing and events of the cartoon version. I might even make it full-screen. 

 when you say 'full screen' that you mean 4:3? If so you would have to crop it down a lot and it would look bad, even if you are thinking of cropping to 16:9 you would still have to crop ether way its not going to look as good!

Author
Time

TheBoost said:

L.P. Hovercraft said:

lotrjw said:

doubleofive said:

Peter Jackson on the two-film edit:

The split was going to occur where Bard [Luke Evans] appears on the river bank as a silhouetted figure with a bow. So the whole barrel sequence was going to be the climax.



Just in case someone wants to re-create the alternate universe two-movie edit.

 that would be cool along with cutting some bits out that weren't in ether the Hobbit or Lord of the Rings books, it might make for two roughly 3 hour films!

The old 90 minute Rankin/Bass Hobbit moved along at a pretty brisk pace without leaving TOO much out or adding lots of extra padding so still remains my favorite adaptation so far, but I still think Del Toro (or PJ) could have made one or even two REALLY amazing movies from this story on par with the LOTR films IF the focus actually remained on the title character of Bilbo instead of on Alfrid, Legolas, Kili/Tauriel, the white Orc, the White Council, etc. 

As it is, splitting this story into three bloated films has really killed this version as far as I'm concerned--a lot of the extra stuff in the films could have been added back in for the extended editions but should probably not have been left in for the more streamlined theatrical versions. 

I'm really looking forward to watching a shorter one or two movie edit and think it will do wonders for my prequelesque feelings of mehness about the current PJ versions.

 I'm contemplating doing a edit that matches as best I can the pacing and events of the cartoon version. I might even make it full-screen. 

Nice--looking forward to checking it out if you do.  I think if PJ even stuck to the cartoon's script and just added a few bits and bobs here and there to flesh it out to a single epic 2 & 1/2 or 3 hour film, The Hobbit really could have been a new fantasy classic.

By the by, looks like someone has already chopped the 3 films down into one 4 & 1/2 hour version (which is still pretty long to sit through in one sitting if you ask me!):

https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/

Snip, Snap, Snorum…Hey, Kak, Kalorum!

Channel 73 WODS-TV

Author
Time

L.P. Hovercraft said:

https://tolkieneditor.wordpress.com/

Seems like the obvious filler plots have been removed, but there's still a long way to go to get it to a manageable running time. From what he posted of the Barrel Ride sequence, I see a whole lot there that could be cut. The entire attack by the orcs could be substantially reduced and probably eliminated (as much as I love Bombur's over-the-top antics), and that's just one example.

You probably don’t recognize me because of the red arm.
Episode 9 Rewrite, The Starlight Project (Released!) and ANH Technicolor Project (Released!)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Unlike the LOTR trilogy, the HOBBIT movies have sadly ended up on my 'edits-I'd-like-to-do-one-day' list, and it's been interesting to see some of the views here and elsewhere about the various ways to edit them.

I'm actually only getting round to catching the final instalment on the big screen tomorrow, as I wasn't able to fit it in over the Christmas/New Year period as I originally intended...so will be interested to see how Jackson wraps things up.

Since I happened to be a 'philistine' that had never actually read any of the Tolkien books (!), I was able to watch Jackson's 'cinematic' LOTR trilogy as something fresh at the time, without any knowledge of how things would pan out...and without any pre-conceptions about how they *should* have turned out compared to the original source material.  I had a great time with each of them at the time, and liked the 'extended' versions even more - although I *still* think that ROTK should have ended where everyone kneeled for Frodo and the hobbits, as the camera looked up at them... :) 

However...as much as I was pleased that Jackson was going to direct the HOBBIT movies too, in the end...I'd also read the concerns that many Tolkien fans had about the fact that he was turning this smaller scale 'prequel' to LOTR into a full-blown trilogy of movies once again.  And since I've ended up having to drastically alter many, many moments of Jackson's self-indulgent 'King Kong' for myself into a much shorter version I prefer (a mix of the 'Theatrical' and 'Extended' versions), I too wondered just how much of the same excessive 'bloat' he'd introduce over these 3 movies when he got around to them...

Quite a bit it turns out, judging by the first 2 instalments alone...and it'll no doubt take a *lot* of my time to work out the various bits and pieces that I'd rather see altered throughout the 3 movies eventually.  However, at some point I'll look forward to watching the 4-hour-plus 'The Hobbit:The Tolkien Edit' by TolkienEditor that's linked to above...as I already caught some of the things he wrote across at Fanedit.org recently, and some of his ideas seem to chime with some of my own.  Yes, it's long...but there's always the 'pause' button if anyone wants a 'break'/'intermission'. 

Since I never read the books, I can pick and choose my favourite footage/dialogue out of Jackson's versions without feeling the urge to follow the way Tolkien laid things out originally, seeing as I was never invested in the books as my first introduction to the characters etc, only the movies themselves.  And of course, I'll be waiting to see what additional scenes the 'extended' version of 'The Battle Of The Five Armies' brings.  But I have a feeling my own eventual version for myself will be split over 2 edited movies, no matter what. :)

 

Author
Time

Ok, I thought I might jump back in this thread after watching "Tolkieneditor's" fanedit of the Hobbit. It looks like we made several similar editing choices along with several dissimilar ones. However the biggest drawback to his version is the poor video quality. Perhaps the 6GB will look nicer but he's still working off a DVD rip of the first two films and a bootleg copy of the third.

That being said, I've gone and made a page on my website dedicated to my fanedit version: JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit. The idea is the same- cut all three films into one long epic that is more faithful to the book. My source media are the 1080p Blurays, so I won't be able to edit the third film until it is released (legitimately) this spring.

Here is the link to my fanedit info page:

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

I'm also going to start a new thread on the topic here.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/JRR-Tolkiens-The-Hobbit-turning-a-mediocre-trilogy-into-one-really-good-film/topic/17418/

JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

Author
Time
 (Edited)

eldusto84 said:

Ok, I thought I might jump back in this thread after watching "Tolkieneditor's" fanedit of the Hobbit. It looks like we made several similar editing choices along with several dissimilar ones. However the biggest drawback to his version is the poor video quality. Perhaps the 6GB will look nicer but he's still working off a DVD rip of the first two films and a bootleg copy of the third.

That being said, I've gone and made a page on my website dedicated to my fanedit version: JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit. The idea is the same- cut all three films into one long epic that is more faithful to the book. My source media are the 1080p Blurays, so I won't be able to edit the third film until it is released (legitimately) this spring.

Here is the link to my fanedit info page:

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

I'm also going to start a new thread on the topic here.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/JRR-Tolkiens-The-Hobbit-turning-a-mediocre-trilogy-into-one-really-good-film/topic/17418/

I like the way you cut the intro; I was never a huge fan of seeing LOTR era old Bilbo and Frodo in the PJ version but I have to admit I REALLY missed hearing the famous words:  "In a hole in the ground there lived a hobbit..." in the four hour Tolkien edit.  That's the way the Hobbit really needs to begin IMO so I think your cut is a really good way to work it in without an overly long prologue.  Looking forward to more!

Snip, Snap, Snorum…Hey, Kak, Kalorum!

Channel 73 WODS-TV

Author
Time

Thanks! With Frodo and the unnecessary Dale/Erebor prologue gone, old Bilbo's intro fits in very nicely. It also ties in Tolkien's work and the LOTR films with one scene. Plus it's a great bookend for how Battle of Five Armies concluded, which was one of the few things that worked for that film.

Let me know what you think of the other clips. If you compare "Tolkieneditor's" version of the barrel chase, you'll see he cut out the battle at the gate but still left the CGI acrobatics with Bombur intact- a puzzling decision.

JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

Author
Time
 (Edited)

eldusto84 said:

Ok, I thought I might jump back in this thread after watching "Tolkieneditor's" fanedit of the Hobbit. It looks like we made several similar editing choices along with several dissimilar ones. However the biggest drawback to his version is the poor video quality. Perhaps the 6GB will look nicer but he's still working off a DVD rip of the first two films and a bootleg copy of the third.

That being said, I've gone and made a page on my website dedicated to my fanedit version: JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit. The idea is the same- cut all three films into one long epic that is more faithful to the book. My source media are the 1080p Blurays, so I won't be able to edit the third film until it is released (legitimately) this spring.

Here is the link to my fanedit info page:

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

I'm also going to start a new thread on the topic here.

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/JRR-Tolkiens-The-Hobbit-turning-a-mediocre-trilogy-into-one-really-good-film/topic/17418/

Thanks for sharing! I have been slowly working on my own edit, and it has been very interesting reading about the cuts you made, along with those from the Dwarfed edition and the 4.5 hour Tolkieneditor edition. Rather than strictly trying to shorten the movies or try to make them close to the book, my goal is to get them as close as I can to Jackson's original 2 film version. I don't have any problem with them being somewhat flawed or changed from the book, I just felt that the theatrical editions were overstuffed and distracted from the core story. I'm sure there will be a lot of versions out there, and my interest is really just to make a version that I want to watch, and as a secondary motive maybe to give some other editors a few good ideas. 

So far I have an early cut of one movie up to the point where they meed Bard. My only major change is that I moved the Erebor prologue to the start of movie two. Movie one now starts with "It began as you might expect. In a hole in the ground..." There's still a bit of Bilbo and Frodo, but you get to the main story much more quickly and the entire beginning is in Bag End. Movie two will start with the Erebor prologue, which is good in its own right and much more relevant to what's happening in that movie. 

Aside from that, almost all of my changes are just removing extraneous side stories and clipping a few small bits of dialogue. I removed: Radagast's first two scenes, most of Azog, the flashback to Moria, some of the dwarves goofing around in Rivendell, part of the White Council, the extensive escape from Goblin Town, and most of Legolas and Tauriel. I left the wargs and eagles in, but I cut it down significantly so that no one leaves the trees except by eagle.  Similarly, I cut down the barrel chase so that no one gets out of their barrels or has weapons. Kili is still injured afterwards, but it never shows how it happened. 

I'm already planning to make a handful of changes (smooth out the transition between movies, cut the elves down a bit more, fix a few audio issues), but it's pretty close to what I want and I'd love to hear any impressions of it. My plans for movie two involve more significant changes, but largely I'm going to remove a lot of excessive action sequences and cut out anything that happens when the company isn't present. Bard is the only exception, since he's fairly integral to the plot, but he'll be cut down a bit too. I'm going to try to finish at least rough cuts of both movies before watching anyone else's edits, but I am very interested in seeing how others got around the little issues that pop up once you start taking scenes out. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Found another project here, calling itself There and Back Again: A Hobbit's Cut

https://ahobbitsholiday.wordpress.com/

Pacing's kinda wonky, but it's a pretty decent book-edit. Actually manages to sidestep the Orcs attacking during the barrel sequence entirely and Azog's been cut out entirely with Bolg in his place.

Author
Time

FigmentJedi said:

Found another project here, calling itself There and Back Again: A Hobbit's Cut

https://ahobbitsholiday.wordpress.com/

Pacing's kinda wonky, but it's a pretty decent book-edit. Actually manages to sidestep the Orcs attacking during the barrel sequence entirely and Azog's been cut out entirely with Bolg in his place.

I just looked through this version. While it's impressive he was able to cut everything to three hours, the pacing of the entire film suffers as a result. Scenes and characters come and go so fast...nothing has time to breathe. There are also several audio issues and other continuity problems created by some of the edits. Between this and Tolkieneditor's version, I'd say the latter is the best complete fanedit right now.

This is just making me more excited to get my hands on the BOTFA bluray and start cutting away.

JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

Author
Time

Not that I'm trying to criticize anyone's attempts here, but I'm surprised at the number of people who don't seem to want to wait until the EE of BotFA comes out. To me, that's the one that's clearly missing large chunks of important stuff in its theatrical form.

I've always been planning to do a 3-in-1 edit for myself and my relatives/friends (which I will, of course, share online as well), but I decided as soon as the credits started rolling on BotFA that I wouldn't touch it until I had the EE Blu-Ray in hand. There's just too much that's clearly missing that I feel is necessary to build a proper conclusion, especially when I plan on cutting the final battle to complete and utter shreds in my version.

Of course, if the EE comes and nothing substantial is added, I'm gonna be pretty pissed...

Author
Time

Wow, there's a lot of us working on 3 into 1 edits :)

I've made a lot of progress on mine, including preliminary cuts on BOTFA. I'll be moving my cuts over to the Blu Ray source when it's available, and I'm waiting on a couple of other sources too. I have someone helping with visual effects too, and some of the redone shots are truly mindblowing. I'll be able to showcase these when I'm closer to releasing it. Don't want to jump the gun and then run into issues and disappoint everyone.  

Author
Time

It looks like many editors are trying to have the first Hobbit fanedit out of the gate, such as Tolkieneditor or a few other guys that have made their versions using the horrible-quality bootleg version of BOTFA.

I'm going to start editing the Theatrical Bluray when it comes out in a few months, but won't make a completely final version until the EE is released later this year. At that point I'll pick and choose which extras scenes will stay or go. I'll probably still upload a "nearly finished" version in between then just to get some feedback from viewers though.

JRR Tolkien's The Hobbit

http://www.maple-films.com/the-hobbit-fanedit

Author
Time

Erik Pancakes said:

Not that I'm trying to criticize anyone's attempts here, but I'm surprised at the number of people who don't seem to want to wait until the EE of BotFA comes out. To me, that's the one that's clearly missing large chunks of important stuff in its theatrical form.

I've always been planning to do a 3-in-1 edit for myself and my relatives/friends (which I will, of course, share online as well), but I decided as soon as the credits started rolling on BotFA that I wouldn't touch it until I had the EE Blu-Ray in hand. There's just too much that's clearly missing that I feel is necessary to build a proper conclusion, especially when I plan on cutting the final battle to complete and utter shreds in my version.

Of course, if the EE comes and nothing substantial is added, I'm gonna be pretty pissed...

 People who start working on edits now will be able to step away from the film, get feedback, and revise. By the time the EE is released they'll already be mostly done. Also, as someone who is working on one myself I appreciate being able to compare my edits with others. 

On the other hand, if I just wanted to watch the movie I wouldn't be too excited about the current edits. 

FigmentJedi said:

Found another project here, calling itself There and Back Again: A Hobbit's Cut

https://ahobbitsholiday.wordpress.com/

Pacing's kinda wonky, but it's a pretty decent book-edit. Actually manages to sidestep the Orcs attacking during the barrel sequence entirely and Azog's been cut out entirely with Bolg in his place.

 

I watched the first half of this one last night. I'm not crazy about how fast it is, but I like a lot of the choices he made. 

Author
Time

I really hate the Goblin fight and the look of the Goblin king. I would cut those images away completely.

An idea I'm toying with is to let some sound from the dwarves meeting with the Goblin king echo down into the cave where Bilbo has fallen so that we can still hear some of it in the background. Then we don't see the dwarves again until the passage where Bilbo jumps over Gollum. The point would be to keep everything in Bilbo's perspective, but not to miss the context of the Goblins calling the orcs.

Author
Time

That's pretty much what my plan is for that sequence - follow Bilbo when he falls, then we don't see the Dwarves again until he does.

I'm also considering having Thorin/Azog's battle occur off-screen - cut to black when Bilbo is knocked out, then fade back in as he wakes up. Because that fight was awful, and doing that will let me cut out Tauriel and Legolas easily, too.