logo Sign In

Star Wars moving forward without Ms. Fisher — Page 4

Author
Time

ferris209 said:

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

Now this is too soon. For a supposed perfect being, you sure do say a lot of shitty things.

Was he talking about Carrie Fisher or her daughter, Billie Lourd?

He was talking about Fisher.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

However, I do agree that she deserves a scene in Ep 9.

That was uncalled for.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

However, I do agree that she deserves a scene in Ep 9.

That was uncalled for.

There are so many over-exaggerated opinions in this thread about the impact of Fisher on the new trilogy. I am an honest person. I gave a realistic appraisal. And I did so in a civil and respectful manner.

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

However, I do agree that she deserves a scene in Ep 9.

That was uncalled for.

There are so many over-exaggerated opinions in this thread about the impact of Fisher on the new trilogy. I am an honest person. I gave a realistic appraisal. And I did so in a civil and respectful manner.

taking a cheap shot at someone’s acting (even if you were right, which you may be), is not respectful.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

dahmage said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

However, I do agree that she deserves a scene in Ep 9.

That was uncalled for.

There are so many over-exaggerated opinions in this thread about the impact of Fisher on the new trilogy. I am an honest person. I gave a realistic appraisal. And I did so in a civil and respectful manner.

taking a cheap shot at someone’s acting (even if you were right, which you may be), is not respectful.

Since when is being honest and realistic a “cheap shot” or disrespectful? Do you take a cheap shot at and being disrespectful to Hayden when you say his acting in PT was unimpressive?

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Oh sorry, we didn’t realize he just died too.

I mean how can someone who possesses ultimate truth be so clueless?

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

Oh sorry, we didn’t realize he just died too.

So you are not allowed to be honest about the work of a person who died recently? That is stupid.

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

Oh sorry, we didn’t realize he just died too.

So you are not allowed to be honest about the work of a person who died recently? That is stupid.

Shitting on an actor a few days after she died is completely disrespectful and unnecessary. “Too soon” was invented for a reason that seems to have escaped you.

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

dahmage said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

If her role and performance in Ep 8 will be as unimpressive as it was in TFA, Star Wars should be moving forward normally.

However, I do agree that she deserves a scene in Ep 9.

That was uncalled for.

There are so many over-exaggerated opinions in this thread about the impact of Fisher on the new trilogy. I am an honest person. I gave a realistic appraisal. And I did so in a civil and respectful manner.

taking a cheap shot at someone’s acting (even if you were right, which you may be), is not respectful.

Since when is being honest and realistic a “cheap shot” or disrespectful? Do you take a cheap shot at and being disrespectful to Hayden when you say his acting in PT was unimpressive?

You’re a piece of shit.

Not a cheap shot, I’m just being honest and realistic.

Author
Time

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

真実

Author
Time

Okay, this has escalated enough.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

Are you purposely being difficult or do you really not understand the difference between lying and just not saying anything?

Either way is reflecting quite poorly on you.

Author
Time

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

Are you purposely being difficult or do you really not understand the difference between lying and just not saying anything?

Then what is the point of a thread if you are not supposed to discuss its topic seriously?

真実

Author
Time

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

People here are still dealing with their shock and grief. A little sensitivity would not kill you. There are better ways to express your opinion without pouring salt into open wounds.

Forum Moderator

Where were you in '77?

Author
Time
 (Edited)

imperialscum said:

TV’s Frink said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

Are you purposely being difficult or do you really not understand the difference between lying and just not saying anything?

Then what is the point of a thread if you are not supposed to discuss its topic seriously?

I don’t know if you genuinely want an answer to that (I suspect not) but I no longer care either way.

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

People here are still dealing with their shock and grief. A little sensitivity would not kill you. There are better ways to express your opinion without pouring salt into open wounds.

His goal, as always, was to get a reaction, not to communicate a point.

The Person in Question

Author
Time

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

People here are still dealing with their shock and grief. A little sensitivity would not kill you. There are better ways to express your opinion without pouring salt into open wounds.

You may go and check my post again. I was as sensitive as possible within the constraint of being honest. I said “unimpressive”, which is not even negative to begin with.

Anyway, it seems we are not suppose to discuss the topic, so I will just stay out of this thread.

真実

Author
Time
 (Edited)

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

SilverWook said:

imperialscum said:

I hope I do not need to remind you that is not a thread named “In memory of” or something similar (we have a thread for that purpose). This thread specifically ask how will a certain event impact future of Star Wars. This is no place for pointless gestures. We are supposed to discuss the matter realistically here.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tact

So I am just supposed to lie for the sake of being “positive” and compassionate? Then maybe threads like this should not be allowed until normal honest discussion is deemed “appropriate” again.

People here are still dealing with their shock and grief. A little sensitivity would not kill you. There are better ways to express your opinion without pouring salt into open wounds.

You may go and check my post again. I was as sensitive as possible within the constraint of being honest. I said “unimpressive”, which is not even negative to begin with.

Anyway, it seems we are not suppose to discuss the topic, so I will just stay out of this thread.

I apologize for calling you a piece of shit. Sometimes I forget how stupid you are when it comes to understanding basic human interaction. Will try to use more tact when I respond to you in the future.

Author
Time

Fang Zei said:

My thoughts?

I don’t want them reusing footage or using cgi for Episode IX. This is all obviously dependent on how things play out in VIII (and whether or not they simply make changes to that movie as well), but what I would want them to do is to take a page from how Leonard Nimoy’s death was addressed in Star Trek Beyond. Early in Episode IX, have a scene where a group of characters return from a battle. It was a victory, but General Organa was killed leading the Resistance.

An idea someone posted in the comments at birthmoviesdeath that I actually loved:

“(at some point) cut to a memorial statue or plaque, and we dolly out to reveal a person (Finn? Poe? Rey?) paying their respects as they pass by before joining a meeting or on their way to a ship or something.
They could even touch it and say “for luck” before moving on.”

I really like both of those ideas. That way they could give her the heroic death she deserves but not have to kill her on screen (since that may be considered in poor taste).

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I just thought about a ceremony aboard a starship depositing her body, as ashes, into space where Alderaan was.

Author
Time

My opinion is to use CGI to have her in Episode IX and continue as previously planned with episode IX. If they were intending to kill her in episode IX, do so. If they weren’t, don’t. Some will say it would be disrespectful and it is too. It if was not disrespectful to Cushing, why would it be to Fisher? As for being too soon, just where is that line drawn? 20 years? 15 years? 10 years? 5 years? 3 years? Where??? and who decides this? I think she would want to be in episode IX. Get the approval of the fisher’s family first of course(and don’t do it without it).