logo Sign In

Info: New GOUT revelation

Author
Time
 (Edited)

GOUT was not “weave” deinterlaced, it was “bob” de-interlaced.

still gathering additional evidence, but I’m about 95% sure.

-G

Author
Time
 (Edited)

EDIT: I didn't know what you meant so I did a bit of digging. The 'weave' method is generally considered to be superior in most cases, correct?

Will you be altering your stabilization scripts now, or is that totally unrelated?

Author
Time

Can you explain exactly what you mean?

If the video on the master tape was telecined 29.97fps:

  • A 'bob' would give a result 59.94fps.
  • A 'weave' would leave the fps unchanged at 29.97.
  • An inverse telecine (IVTC) to remove the 3:2 pulldown would result in a framerate of 23.976fps.

The framerate of the GOUT is 23.976, so IVTC has been carried out. Are you suggesting that it was bobbed afterwards then every other frame discarded? This would explain the vertical blur that is present. 

Guidelines for post content and general behaviour: read announcement here

Max. allowable image sizes in signatures: reminder here

Author
Time
Moth3r said:

every other frame discarded? This would explain the vertical blur that is present. 

 

 Yep.

Half of the vertical resolution was thrown away. It also accounts for all of the aliasing. Conducted additional experiments last night, and now I'm about 99.99% sure.

-G

Author
Time
Mielr said:

EDIT: I didn't know what you meant so I did a bit of digging. The 'weave' method is generally considered to be superior in most cases, correct?

Will you be altering your stabilization scripts now, or is that totally unrelated?

 

 Unfortunately, the damage is done, and the best that can be done after such an event is already in the script.

-G

Author
Time

Ouch.

Glad my friend got me the 1993 LDs, then.

"Right now the coffees are doing their final work." (Airi, Masked Rider Den-o episode 1)

Author
Time

This begs the question: Why?  Is this problem on the LD, or did they deliberately cripple the DVDs?

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest if it turned out that they indeed deliberately cripple the GOUT.

Nice job, Georgey. You've done it again.

Who's the more foolish... the fool who makes or the fool who buys this crap?

   - George Lucas on the 2004 SE DVD's

Author
Time

Well that explains alot, and no I am not suprised. 

Beacuse I have seens some DVD's that come from LD masters and they aren't to bad. 

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Has anyone ever attempted a project to merge an LD capture with the GOUT video on the field level? I wonder if it's possible to reconstruct frames and get a bit more detail/vertical resolution without introducing to much analog noise. Of course, even if such an avisynth script was possible, it would be a huge project, manually aligning every shot (every frame?) and color correcting to match.

Author
Time

Well comparing the vertical details from the X0 project and another X0/X9 LD capture, in these screenshots the GOUT appear to have the same vertical resolution as the LDs.

GOUT

http://img19.imageshack.us/img19/7156/gout1.jpg

 

X0 project

http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/5638/x01w.jpg

 

GOUT

http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/7250/gout2.jpg

 

other X0 or X9 capture

http://img40.imageshack.us/img40/5085/x02x.jpg

 

But I agree there are some other shots/scenes/areas in the GOUT where the vertical resolution seems to be cut in half, but I would suspect it was caused by a crude AA filter and to some degree incomplete (lazy) IVTC work.

Author
Time

Playing devil's advocate here: Is there any legitimate reason for them to have done this? Did they think it might reduce the grain? 

I just find it hard to believe that they would have gone through the extra trouble to actually make it worse.

You know of the rebellion against the Empire?

Author
Time
 (Edited)
g-force said: Half of the vertical resolution was thrown away. It also accounts for all of the aliasing. Conducted additional experiments last night, and now I'm about 99.99% sure.

-G

The aliasing is present on the LDs too, though (especially on SW). How does that figure in?

 

Author
Time

Okay, after seeing Red5's screen caps, I retract all previous statements. The aliasing is in the master tape then, if it's in both the GOUT and the X_ captures.

Shoot, I really thought I was on to something. I was under the impression that there was much less aliasing in the laserdiscs, and if the aliasing was a symptom of bob de-interlacing, that would imply nearly twice the resolution in the laserdiscs. Looking at those screencaps, that is definitely not the case.

Sorry to confuse everyone.

-G