logo Sign In

Negative One and TeamNegativeOne

This topic has been locked by a moderator.

Author
Time

Why do we put up with this?  Ric Olie gets buried.  Cookie Monster bites the dust.  All the fun socks are gone.  I can understand the universal policy, though I wish it weren't so.  I understand that its easier to exercise a rule universally instead of selectively.  But clearly the Negative One charade is a sock: members of the "team" all of the sudden joined at once without prior involvement at this site, are always in agreement, at times type with Negative One's style, and yet say that the original founder of the team hardly participates anymore.

All I can figure is that we allow it because of the valuable work provided in order to maintain anonymity.  IBut then, it's not like it's kept a secret in other threads either.  I've got no beef with the guy.  He seems nice enough.  I just don't get exception.

Author
Time

Maybe he cloned himself. Wouldn't be a sock technically.

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.

Author
Time

Well, the original negative1 doesn't post anymore, so it's more like a new account than a sock, even if he doesn't pretend it's him. Anyway, because he's only posting from one account, I imagine no one really cares. If the old one comes back that'd probably when the matter would be more seriously considered.

Author
Time

This is why we need a multiverse. Multiple variations of a single thing co-existing on a single world just cause confusion and chaos.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

With that said, I had forgotten about Moth3r's post, and I assumed that Negative 1 was given latitude due to his contributions to the community.  But seeing Moth3r's post again, and realizing Negative 1 is not suppose to be posting using the team account, it's only fair to point out there have been several instances of the real Negative 1 posting with the team account in the past few months.  I don't think I could find them, but I definitely remember the team account posting with his unique style.  And this despite the laughable assertion by the team account (on multiple occasions) that Negative 1 is no longer active or part of the team.

And having said that, I think it's quite possible that he's posting with the team account lately, without using his unique style.  The team account has been posting a lot lately outside of their project threads (see the 4k thread, for just one example), with a lot of negativity, and a lot of the "we" bullshit that we all know actually means "I."

The allowed use of a team account is a bad idea IMO because how many people are using it?  Who is posting what?  When the team account says "we know that 4k is a pointless medium," who is really saying that?

I don't have any solutions here, as it's impossible to police this, and I do recognize the contributions the team is making to the community.  But it certainly is annoying and I certainly will continue to speak my mind about it.

JEDIT: One more thing, I will never, ever understand the Ric Olie banning.  But I'm cool with Cookie Monster being banned.  He was kind of a loser.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

I just want to know why every post has "Team Negative1" signed at the bottom, when it's already said at least 3 times in every post?

Oh and if we are having a random bitch, I'm getting really sick of that Peter O'Toole gif in your signature DuracellEnergizer. It was cool at first but when it's in a thread where half of the posts have it, it gets a bit tiring on the eye. Sorry to be a grouch.

Ryan McAvoy

VIZ TOP TIPS! - PARENTS. Impress your children by showing them a floppy disk and telling them it’s a 3D model of a save icon.

Author
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

I just want to know why every post has "Team Negative1" signed at the bottom, when it's already said at least 3 times in every post?

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/TVs-Frinks-List-of-Bannable-Offenses/post/770754/#TopicPost770754

Oh and if we are having a random bitch, I'm getting really sick of that Peter O'Toole gif in your signature DuracellEnergizer. It was cool at first but when it's in a thread where half of the posts have it, it gets a bit tiring on the eye. Sorry to be a grouch.

Go to your preferences, and turn off images in signatures.

Ryan McAvoy

 TV's Frink

Author
Time

Well apparently this is an entire team we are talking about here. I think as a team, they are allowed as many accounts as the number of persons in the team. :p

真実

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Ryan McAvoy said:

Oh and if we are having a random bitch, I'm getting really sick of that Peter O'Toole gif in your signature DuracellEnergizer. It was cool at first but when it's in a thread where half of the posts have it, it gets a bit tiring on the eye. Sorry to be a grouch.

Go to your preferences, and turn off images in signatures.

I have a better idea. You can block just the one image using either adblock plus or ublock. That way you could still see other images in signatures...

Nobody sang The Bunny Song in years…

Author
Time

Ryan McAvoy said:

I just want to know why every post has "Team Negative1" signed at the bottom, when it's already said at least 3 times in every post?

Oh and if we are having a random bitch, I'm getting really sick of that Peter O'Toole gif in your signature DuracellEnergizer. It was cool at first but when it's in a thread where half of the posts have it, it gets a bit tiring on the eye. Sorry to be a grouch.

Ryan McAvoy

Very well. However, I will have to make it my avatar to compensate*.

*A non-animated version, unfortunately. 

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

With that said, I had forgotten about Moth3r's post, and I assumed that Negative 1 was given latitude due to his contributions to the community.  But seeing Moth3r's post again, and realizing Negative 1 is not suppose to be posting using the team account, it's only fair to point out there have been several instances of the real Negative 1 posting with the team account in the past few months.  I don't think I could find them, but I definitely remember the team account posting with his unique style.  And this despite the laughable assertion by the team account (on multiple occasions) that Negative 1 is no longer active or part of the team.

And having said that, I think it's quite possible that he's posting with the team account lately, without using his unique style.  The team account has been posting a lot lately outside of their project threads (see the 4k thread, for just one example), with a lot of negativity, and a lot of the "we" bullshit that we all know actually means "I."

The allowed use of a team account is a bad idea IMO because how many people are using it?  Who is posting what?  When the team account says "we know that 4k is a pointless medium," who is really saying that?

I don't have any solutions here, as it's impossible to police this, and I do recognize the contributions the team is making to the community.  But it certainly is annoying and I certainly will continue to speak my mind about it.

JEDIT: One more thing, I will never, ever understand the Ric Olie banning.  But I'm cool with Cookie Monster being banned.  He was kind of a loser.

 We don't understand why this is a problem and we still see Ric Olie posting so we don't get it.

K. Let’s have this ride.

Author
Time

Oh, there were two of them? No wonder one was banned!

K. Let’s have this ride.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

And having said that, I think it's quite possible that he's posting with the team account lately, without using his unique style.  The team account has been posting a lot lately outside of their project threads (see the 4k thread, for just one example), with a lot of negativity, and a lot of the "we" bullshit that we all know actually means "I."

The allowed use of a team account is a bad idea IMO because how many people are using it?  Who is posting what?  When the team account says "we know that 4k is a pointless medium," who is really saying that?

I've noticed that too. It's mostly in threads that involve the release of Star Wars related material, like the OOT in both the 4K thread and the one in "Theatrical Cuts vs Special Editions", but also in the Bonus Material thread when he said that no deleted scenes will ever be released again. It's pretty weird and uncomfortable.

The Person in Question

Author
Time

Trident said:


Oh, there were two of them? No wonder one was banned!
One is just some kid, the original was actually Ric Olie.

Star Wars Revisited Wordpress

Star Wars Visual Comparisons WordPress

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

Get back on the short bus buddy ..... you're holding up the field trip to the Zoo.

;)

Author
Time

Jetrell Fo said:

TV's Frink said:

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

Get back on the short bus buddy ..... you're holding up the field trip to the Zoo.

;)

 

Jetro, are you the cueball or the carrottop?

Don’t do drugs, unless you’re with me.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

Trident said:


Oh, there were two of them? No wonder one was banned!

One is just some kid, the original was actually Ric Olie.

And furthermore, the actual Ric Olie, the one who was banned, was here first.  So the banning of one had nothing to do with the other.

More here:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-Ric-Olie-Observation-Thread/post/377439/#TopicPost377439 (make sure you read to the part where Ric is allowed to stay)

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Update-on-recent-troll-and-sock-puppet-activity/topic/16173/

Author
Time

Neglify said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV's Frink said:

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

Get back on the short bus buddy ..... you're holding up the field trip to the Zoo.

;)

 

Jetro, are you the cueball or the carrottop?

 NO BILL COSBY He's DEAD TO ME.

Author
Time

Neglify said:

Jetrell Fo said:

TV's Frink said:

Before I say anything, I'll mention that I am aware of how much rope I am given outside of off-topic, and truly I am appreciative of it.

Get back on the short bus buddy ..... you're holding up the field trip to the Zoo.

;)

 

Jetro, are you the cueball or the carrottop?

The carrot top .....  LOL

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

And having said that, I think it's quite possible that he's posting with the team account lately, without using his unique style.  The team account has been posting a lot lately outside of their project threads (see the 4k thread, for just one example), with a lot of negativity, and a lot of the "we" bullshit that we all know actually means "I."

 It's also worth noting that this is exactly how -1 reacted to anyone suggesting he release Blu-Ray versions of any of his previous contributions rather than the HD-DVD ones he adamantly insisted on for years after the format was declared dead.

A Goon in a Gaggle of 'em

Author
Time
 (Edited)

doubleofive said:

Trident said:


Oh, there were two of them? No wonder one was banned!

One is just some kid, the original was actually Ric Olie.

 You mean it was actually the guy who played Ric in the movie?

Never mind I understand better after reading Frink's post.

K. Let’s have this ride.

Author
Time

TV's Frink said:

doubleofive said:

Trident said:


Oh, there were two of them? No wonder one was banned!

One is just some kid, the original was actually Ric Olie.

And furthermore, the actual Ric Olie, the one who was banned, was here first.  So the banning of one had nothing to do with the other.

More here:

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/The-Ric-Olie-Observation-Thread/post/377439/#TopicPost377439 (make sure you read to the part where Ric is allowed to stay)

http://originaltrilogy.com/forum/topic.cfm/Update-on-recent-troll-and-sock-puppet-activity/topic/16173/

 That appears to be quite a saga.

I'm still a bit confused about it, but I'm sure once I read it all will be clear! (I just don't have much time today).

K. Let’s have this ride.

Author
Time

bkev said:

TV's Frink said:

And having said that, I think it's quite possible that he's posting with the team account lately, without using his unique style.  The team account has been posting a lot lately outside of their project threads (see the 4k thread, for just one example), with a lot of negativity, and a lot of the "we" bullshit that we all know actually means "I."

 It's also worth noting that this is exactly how -1 reacted to anyone suggesting he release Blu-Ray versions of any of his previous contributions rather than the HD-DVD ones he adamantly insisted on for years after the format was declared dead.

 I really think they should just ban them for this bullshit.  Nobody else gets to have socks, and if the guys so stupid he can't even be bothered to format his posts to look differently he deserves to be banned.    What contributions?  Spending thousands of dollars to get films and scan them so that they look almost half as good as Harmy's versions and will never look close to being as good?  I mean sure it's cool for novelty purposes, but the guy doesn't deserve to be immune to the rules just for having a cool novelty project.