- Time
- (Edited)
- Post link
lordjedi said:
How do you guys even enjoy movies anymore? You nitpick over every little thing, down to the possibility of a pick up shot looking out of place. It's no wonder you haven't seen a movie you've liked in the past 10 years.
To quote Charlie Brown "Good grief".
How do you guys even enjoy movies anymore? You nitpick over every little thing, down to the possibility of a pick up shot looking out of place. It's no wonder you haven't seen a movie you've liked in the past 10 years.
To quote Charlie Brown "Good grief".
I didn't like the 'joke' anyway, all I'm saying is that it looked bad, I'm not sure why but it did. In the end this could have been a fully CG film or it could have been a completely non CG film it would still be rubbish because of the script, the plot had massive holes and the dialogue wasn't great.
I didn't set out to nitpick this film, I really wanted to like it, but I just can't go to the cinema and turn my brain off, if things don't make sense I notice that and it makes it harder to enjoy the film, I can ignore a few little problems but when you have huge problems with the plot as well as a load of other little problems it adds up to a bad film.
my point about the CG is just that it shows that the filmmakers kept taking the easy way, they obviously didn't care if it ended up looking like crap, and with the budget and resources they had there is no reason the film should look this bad.
and for the record I've seen loads of films I liked in the last 10 years, some I absolutely love, I'm not saying none of them have problems but what they all have is a plot that works which means I can ignore the little problems, the fact is I do not enjoy a film unless it has a good plot and a good script. It's hard to believe that there have been at least 5 writers for Indy 4 and ~15 years of script development and this is the best they could come up with, I had low expectations for the film but the least I was expecting was the wonderful script we had been promised.