logo Sign In

Harmy's THE EMPIRE STRIKES BACK Despecialized Edition HD - V2.0 - MKV & AVCHD (Released) — Page 105

Author
Time

Actually, I did wonder sometimes if it was perfectly in sync all the way. I know that near the end, 2 frames were removed for sync issues, but even in the early scenes, it's a thing I wondered...

I also noticed, when resynchronizing my subtitles, that there was a 1-frame difference between Star Wars DE and Team Blu's BD25 upscale. The 1-frame difference appears in the hangar on Yavin. Since the two version include Hairy-Hen tracks and other similar tracks, I wondered about that, too. Maybe the same thing happened between the Respecialized and the Team Blu's 1997 Upscale, I haven't looked into it yet.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

One frame is not likely to be detected, which is why nobody said anything before Darth Mallwalker checked the title card (even when the audio was being discussed).  I can confirm that the title card appears on frame 689 though.

Those who wish to fix this can run the audio tracks that they want through eac3to.

eac3to input output +42ms

Author
Time

Won't that recode the audio? And wouldn't it be easier to set the delay in MKV Merge/TS Muxer anyway?

Author
Time

Harmy said:Won't that recode the audio?

 No.

Harmy said: And wouldn't it be easier to set the delay in MKV Merge/TS Muxer anyway?

That depends on one's definition of easy.  I like to add the delay to the audio with eac3to so that I am absolutely sure that it's been applied when I watch.  But people can please themselves.

Author
Time

I'll just do it at the muxing stage, when I combine Chew's DVD-Video with 2-channel soundtrack for consumption in my own living room.

Similar topic came up a few years ago, in the ROTJ discussion on page 11 of hairy_hen's thread, where Moth3r offered this from ITU:

Moth3r said:


Errors of +20 ms (audio advanced) and -40 ms (audio delayed) are "detectable", and errors of +40 and -160 ms are "subjectively annoying"*.

A single video frame is displayed for 40ms (PAL) or 41.7ms (NTSC). A single-frame audio delay may be acceptable, but a single frame in advance is clearly not (this is because this is an unnatural condition - we are accustomed to a minor audio lag in everyday life due to the differences between the speeds of light and sound).

* Ref: International Telecommunication Union Document 11A/47-E, 13 October 1993
Maybe "clearly" is too strong a word. In any sample group there's bound to be some who don't notice.
Apologies to anybody who cannot un-see.


Today was my Momma's birthday . . . which reminds me of Harmy.
Let them eat cake!

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

Isn't trimming the frame off the video in the next iteration a valid solution?  The mismatch is already out there in 2.0 and the video will be redone for 2.1 anyway.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time
 (Edited)

This is just weird - where the hell did the extra frame come from? I mean, I had it side-by-side with GOUT video in the project.

But yeah, if there is an extra frame at the beginning, it should be easy to remove in the next version.

Author
Time

Stinky-Dinkins said:

So does this only affect Empire, or is SW 2.5 affected too?

The title card for SW appears at frame 689 too, so both are affected according to this post.

Author
Time
 (Edited)

Chewtobacca said:



Stinky-Dinkins said:

So does this only affect Empire, or is SW 2.5 affected too?


The title card for SW appears at frame 689 too, so both are affected according to this post.
No SW 2.5 is not affected. It should begin at 689, and does.

Sorry if my earlier message was unclear. The "T" in GOUT does stand for Trilogy after all.
But when I wrote "GOUTs" as plural I only meant 'both NTSC & PAL ESBs' are the ones which begin 688.

However, in practice you must take into account the “fuckwit factor”. Just talk to Darth Mallwalker…
-Moth3r

Author
Time

You both have to pay to clean Harmy's pants now.

Project Threepio (Star Wars OOT subtitles)

Author
Time

Wait...what? So what do I need to do in MKVmerge with the audio to correct for this missing frame?

I didn't notice it when I watched it, but I know myself and now that I know it's there I'll notice it....placebo or not. :)

Author
Time

Darth Mallwalker said:  But when I wrote "GOUTs" as plural I only meant 'both NTSC & PAL ESBs' are the ones which begin 688.

Ah, sorry.  I was thinking of the two films that now have 2.x releases (i.e. not Jedi) and misinterpreted your post.  My mistake!  Thanks for the clarification.

Author
Time

Wow, I've been away too long. I didn't know ESBDE 2.0 was finished.

Downloading now.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

chyron8472 said:

Wow, I've been away too long. I didn't know ESBDE 2.0 was finished.

Downloading now.

 Sign up for the newsletter and never miss out again. :)

Click my sig.

Subscribe to HarmyNews!

“Evacuate ...in our moment of triumph? I think you overestimate their chances.”

Author
Time

Nick66 said:

Wait...what? So what do I need to do in MKVmerge with the audio to correct for this missing frame?

I didn't notice it when I watched it, but I know myself and now that I know it's there I'll notice it....placebo or not. :)

 *sticks fingers in ears*

LALALALALALALALA

Author
Time

yoda-sama said:

Since it is usually wise to do the opposite of what Nearsighted Scrappile says, I think Harmy should go into hiding.

 Watch out for space slugs.

TV’s Frink said:

chyron just put a big Ric pic in your sig and be done with it.

Author
Time

@ Harmy

I don't know how busy you are with your studies or your work on ROTJ v2.0 but is there a chance for TESB v2.1 without the additional frame and credits typos, only if you have a timeframe while waiting for new 35mm sources? Of course, it's not that important and depends on the amount of effort.

Author
Time

The same as I said for SW - not until I have much more to update than just that.

Author
Time

Chewtobacca said:

One frame is not likely to be detected, which is why nobody said anything before Darth Mallwalker checked the title card (even when the audio was being discussed).  I can confirm that the title card appears on frame 689 though.

Those who wish to fix this can run the audio tracks that they want through eac3to.

eac3to input output +42ms

Ah, so I guess Darth Mallwalker meant seconds. I thought .041ms would be way too small to notice, but I have previously noticed advanced audio of around 50ms in plenty of other videos so I guess it's not the placebo effect.

So a one frame audio advance is 42ms? And would this be the same for any video that is 23.976 fps? Do you not trust mkvmerge/tsmuxer to apply the delay correctly or is eac3to just your preferred method?

Thanks for your DVD versions by the way.

Author
Time

yoda-sama said:

Since it is usually wise to do the opposite of what Nearsighted Scrappile says, I think Harmy should go into hiding.

 Did I say something to piss you off? I can't tell when people joke online, so I thought I'd ask.

Anyway,

About the sound "discrepancy", Is there a tutorial on how to make the changes permanently to Star Wars v.2.5 and The Empire Strikes Back v.2.0? My forté is audio mastering and preservation, so when it comes to HD video, I am still learning.

It’s really sad when the “creative minds” behind something we hold dear are also guilty of its destruction.

Author
Time

For ESB, just add 42ms delay in Mkvmerge for all audio tracks.

For SW IMO it's better to just not bother, the extra frame appears near the end of the movie and you won't notice anything when watching.

Fanrestore - Fan Restoration Forum: https://fanrestore.com